Pentagon Experts Don't Trust Young Men With Guns, Red Bull
Plus: FBI director says COVID's origins "are most likely a potential lab incident in Wuhan," Supreme Court justices seem skeptical of student loan forgiveness, and more...
Plus: FBI director says COVID's origins "are most likely a potential lab incident in Wuhan," Supreme Court justices seem skeptical of student loan forgiveness, and more...
Historian Jeff Guinn's account focuses on the ATF's oft-overlooked fiasco in the 1993 affair rather than the FBI's widely reported involvement.
A New York Times story about the state's location-specific gun bans glosses over the vast territory they cover.
After a tragic on-set accident, a district attorney used a law passed after the incident to threaten Baldwin with years in jail.
The El Paso incident from a few days ago, the FBI 2021 statistics, and more.
The longest-serving California senator was a hardline drug warrior, a surveillance hawk, and no friend of freedom.
Guidance for judicial examination of legal history.
Although the law did not change, regulators suddenly decided to criminalize unregistered possession of braced pistols.
Join Reason on YouTube and Facebook on Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern for a discussion about the Second Amendment, gun control, and mass shootings.
As usual, Biden's gun policy proposals bump up against reality.
The government argued that marijuana users have no Second Amendment rights because they are dangerous, unvirtuous, and untrustworthy.
Judge James Ho concurs, adding "I write separately to point out that our Founders firmly believed in the fundamental role of government in protecting citizens against violence, as well as the individual right to keep and bear arms—and that these two principles are not inconsistent but entirely compatible with one another."
The president seems to have forgotten his concession that such laws leave murderers with plenty of options that are "just as deadly."
The actor is a polarizing figure. That shouldn't matter when evaluating the criminal case against him.
The researchers identified 662 cases involving threats to multiple victims, but they concede that it's likely "there are many more threats than completed events."
So the Florida Supreme Court held today.
The city has not granted a single permit since the Supreme Court upheld the right to bear arms last June.
an argument about post-Bruen gun legislation from Robert Leider.
By banning firearms from a wide range of "sensitive places," the state effectively nullified the right to bear arms.
The law is hard to defend on logical, practical, or constitutional grounds.
Because of a misdemeanor welfare fraud conviction, Bryan Range is no longer allowed to own guns.
The decision defends the separation of powers and the rule of law against an attempt to prohibit firearm accessories by administrative fiat.
A majority of judges concluded the plain language of the statute does not apply to bump stocks, but they also would have denied Chevron deference had they found the statute ambiguous.
People in power lean on private businesses to impose authoritarian policies forbidden to the government.
discriminates against religious institutions
That the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension "was able to assemble the shotgun components using a stock bolt and a stock bolt washer from another firearm" "was sufficient to prove that the unassembled shotgun parts in this case constituted a firearm."
In historical inquiry, reasoning by analogy is a commonplace task for any lawyer or judge.
Courts, not “experts,” should say what the law is.
1791, not 1868, is the key date for determining the original understanding of the Second Amendment.
When the Second Amendment's plain text covers conduct, it is presumptively protected.
"Armory correctly notes the InRange Video and Recoil Article are accessible "to millions of people," as is anything posted publicly on the internet. Nonetheless, Armory fails to show the InRange Video or Recoil Article reached members of the potential jury pool, let alone irreparably tainted them."
The new ban, which has been blocked by a state judge, so far has fared better in federal court.
It’s a bold and probably unconstitutional goal that’s bound to alienate millions of Americans.
The case is not rendered moot or unripe, the court says, by the California AG's "commitment not to seek attorney's fees or costs under this provision 'unless and until a court ultimately holds that the fee-shifting provision in [a similar Texas law provision related to abortion] is constitutional and enforceable....'"
If an order had been issued, it would have expired months before the attack unless police successfully sought an extension.