Will Democrats Really Grab Your Guns?
Debating "mandatory buy-backs," Afghanistan withdrawal, and back-to-school week on the Reason Podcast.
Debating "mandatory buy-backs," Afghanistan withdrawal, and back-to-school week on the Reason Podcast.
Posting “Finna be lit” on Snapchat shouldn’t have gotten Nathan Myers thrown out of school.
"'There’s definitely an emotional cost to this,' he said. 'But I didn’t get the choice of leaving. I didn’t know what they were going to do.'"
When it comes to deciding who should keep their Second Amendment rights, the deck is stacked against gun owners.
There are different legal standards for the two actions, the Michigan Court of Appeals correctly concludes (in the Siwatu-Salama Ra case).
Facing his district for the first time since going independent, the libertarian congressman preaches legislative process and constitutional principle to an audience thirsty for gun fixes.
The gun control group's new policy proposal is radical, intersectional, and deeply contradictory.
A then-pregnant Siwatu-Salama Ra was sentenced to two years in prison after using an unloaded gun to protect herself, her daughter, and her mom.
Only if you assume they would have happened in the absence of gun confiscation orders.
The Democratic presidential contender suggests that "racist threats or anti-immigrant manifestos" could justify federal gun confiscation orders.
The five Democrats warn that the Court may have to be "restructured" if it keeps making decisions they don't like.
If your neighbor were unbalanced, armed to the teeth and busy posting social-media messages about how much he hates you, you'd certainly support measures to disarm him. But you'd feel more secure if he didn't hate you in the first place.
The justices would be abdicating their duty to uphold the Constitution if they let such political considerations decide legal issues.
The nation's leading scholar of mass shootings explains how media coverage of horrific events such as El Paso and Dayton stoke unwarranted fear and anxiety.
"The Second Amendment is not a suicide pact," the senator says, while glossing over the due process issues raised by gun confiscation orders.
Do we want Trump in charge of deciding who’s too crazy to own a gun?
The presidential contender nevertheless insists the law reduced mass shooting deaths.
Plus: Hong Kong's pro-democracy protests turn violent as China cracks down, Elizabeth Warren admits taxes are bad for business, and more...
If "the notion that we can identify mass killers before they act" is a "fiction," the conventional policy responses to mass shootings are unlikely to be effective.
Store orders ban of violent displays, but is still selling guns and video games.
It's foolish for media outlets to imply that laws which were signed in May and June were passed in relation to the tragic shooting in El Paso.
The law demands use of Real I.D. compliant identification for background checks that many state residents don't have
Here is how the states with "red flag" laws fail to protect the constitutional rights of gun owners.
What’s next for the Second Amendment at SCOTUS?
The Trump-endorsed response to mass shootings gives due process short shrift.
Deflections, generational conflict, and misleading data abound.
Because psychiatrists are terrible at predicting violent behavior, the wider net would catch lots of harmless people.
Plus: Monday market swings spark freakout, Hong Kong "now a revolution," and more...
Plus: the budget deal, GOP retirements, and the latest front in the trade war.
The familiar proposals would do little or nothing to prevent attacks like these.
The president offers the worst of both worlds.
Plus: the trouble with "national conservatism," the decline of the mortgage interest deduction, and more...
Plus: A second shooting in Dayton leaves 9 dead, dozens injured.
The presidential contender feels no need to defend the policies he favors, because "we all know" they are "the right thing to do."
So the D.C. Circuit held today.
The late Supreme Court justice was an inconsistent defender of civil liberties.
The retired Supreme Court justice has died at 99.
Officers will now have to argue that killing was necessary and not just say they had a fear they were in danger.
As of last week, only around 700 weapons had been turned over.
The new law says that someone buying a semi-automatic rifle has to be at least 21, pass a stricter background check, take a safety training course, and complete a 10-day waiting period.
The principal calls it "very, very serious" wrongdoing.
Sanity prevails (for now) in Alabama case that sparked national outrage.
The plaintiffs say manufacturers broke the law by producing rifles that were compatible with accessories that facilitate rapid firing.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10