Hillary's Gun Proposals Assault the Constitution
Clinton wants to make gun manufacturers financially liable for misuse of their products and require background checks for all gun transfers.
Clinton wants to make gun manufacturers financially liable for misuse of their products and require background checks for all gun transfers.
Not what People wants them to think.
Guns - and the Second Amendment - won't just disappear.
Like the president, the presumptive Democratic nominee assumes we can identify mass shooters before they strike.
What happened to gun control from 2000 to 2012? Funny you should ask...
Talking about mass shootings, the president cited data on suicides.
What The New Yorker gets wrong about guns and the Constitution.
Increasingly sophisticated homemade guns are so entrenched cops fear their use by organized crime, so now let's fret over desktop weapons of mass destruction.
More background checks, more assault weapon bans, more suits against gun makers and sellers, and expanding group of people to whom gun ownership bans apply.
How would the government enforce a limit on the number of firearms people may possess?
Their profile is shared by many people who never kill anyone.
The only defender guaranteed to be present at any attack against you is you.
Last week President Obama asked us to compare terrorism to gun violence. Maybe we should.
Obama's talk of common-sense gun safety laws don't seem to apply to this tragedy.
Wants less shouting, more good policy.
Any attempt to stop would-be murderers from buying guns is bound to be overinclusive, underinclusive, or both.
How can we know simple gun safety laws would help when we know nothing about circumstances of how the killer got the gun?
The answer, like the frequency of youth gun carrying, may vary from state to state.
The most popular gun-control proposals would have little effect, while the most effective measures would be immensely unpopular.
Do less than 1 percent of crime victims defend themselves with firearms?
State AG just got the authority to investigate such shootings last month.
National Journal reads too much into a correlation.
A thriving and unbeatable black market makes weapons available no matter what officials intend.
"I've been a human powder keg for a while....just waiting to go BOOM," said Flanagan.
The New York Times thinks so.
"Stronger mental health screenings for prospective gun owners" would strip many harmless people of their Second Amendment rights.
Chuck Schumer and Amy Schumer employ the same old anti-gun rhetoric.
In New York City, you can't even wield a fake gun on TV... unless you're making anti-gun propaganda.
"Something has to be done" is generally an indicator of a bad, reactionary policy.
Under current law, the Louisiana theater shooter was properly cleared.
And a federal court continues to violate handgun sellers' First Amendment rights in California
Man who opened fire in crowded theater fails with insanity-plea defense.
What Sanders' third-party home had to say about guns in 1972
Should "unlawful users" of "controlled substances" automatically lose their Second Amendment rights?
And why should all the millions caught up in the drug war be deprived of Second Amendment rights?
A bizarre scandal, even by political standards.
The logic may lean that way, but we can't be sure the Court values the Second Amendment's application that strongly.
A race to check off boxes on the Democratic side
The dragnet would ensnare many harmless people without having a significant impact on gun violence.
The urge to "do something" after the Charleston church attack inspires half-baked proposals.
SAFE Act widely ignored, New York state is forced to admit.
A much-hyped new Violence Policy Center study grossly misses the point about guns' value in self-defense.
Probably not: "I don't think it's an answer," says the former Bush adviser.