"Tomorrow We Should Do More" and Other Reasons Gun Rights Folk Mistrust President Obama
Obama's announcement today uses public mass gun murder to buttress irrelevant policies, with vague promises of "more."
Obama's announcement today uses public mass gun murder to buttress irrelevant policies, with vague promises of "more."
The president seeks to encourage psychiatric treatment while increasing the likelihood that it will result in the loss of Second Amendment rights.
President Obama's urgency on gun control is at odds with what people are really worried about.
The misleading uses, flagrant abuses, and shoddy statistics of social science about gun violence
Purchases would be limited to twice a weapon's capacity every 90 days.
Public murders committed with guns are used to try to drive gun policy, even though gun policy is powerless to prevent them.
Like the president, Hillary Clinton assumes we can identify mass shooters before they strike.
Tyler Cowen makes a fascinating but wanting argument.
The numbers don't justify the outrage and fear.
The Assault Weapons Ban of 2015 covers guns with lethal features like threaded barrels and folding stocks.
Massie's brief argues State Department claiming powers to halt speech related to 3D weapon printing that the relevant law does not, and cannot, give.
Why are avowed civil libertarians so eager to abandon due process and the Bill of Rights?
A response to Tyler Cowen
Gun controllers advocate the imposition of laws that have already failed on people who won't obey them, to address crimes already decreasing in prevalence.
The libertarian acting legend stands up for self-defense.
No-gun zones like the one in effect where the San Bernardino shooting took place are not only unconstitutional but also an invitation to disaster.
Unlike Obama's gun control proposals, armed citizens can stop mass shooters who are invisible until they strike.
Over one-third of the 680,000 suspected terrorists have "no recognized terrorist group affiliation."
You don't have to be a gun-lover to be worried about the vagueness of the language.
A Vox post about Australia highlights declines in suicide, a subject that a post about Japan does not even mention.
How mangled terminology impairs America's gun debates
Justice Thomas faults his colleagues for "relegating the Second Amendment to a second-class right."
The category has no meaning except through legislation.
Tougher gun controls didn't help in California.
A perfect storm for the policy agendas of gun grabbers and Muslim bashers, of right-wing and left-wing statists.
Two of President Obama's favorite gun control solutions did not prevent this week's massacre.
As usual, none of the piggybacked proposals would have affected the tragedy, even if you believe laws are unbreakable.
San Bernardino shooting brings out Sanders' inner gun restrictionist.
Firearms played a key role in the Civil Rights Movement.
Responding to the San Bernardino attack, the president says more people should arbitrarily lose their constitutional rights.
California is a state with a complicated set of gun laws, including universal background checks and "assault weapon" bans.
The New York Times complains that Robert Dear owned guns despite "run-ins with the law."
"Enough is enough" is not a policy.
Something else Donald Trump and Democrats have in common
Or, what in hell is any Michael Bloomberg group doing anywhere near regular BLM-related phone calls?
High Bridge Arms, founded in the mid-1950s by Olympic shooter Bob Chow, shuts down rather than give local police its customer list.
Inside the emotion-fueled politics of Planned Parenthood and school shootings
High Bridge Arms gun shop refused to handover customer information to police.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks