The Campaign Against 'Extremism' Looks Like an Attack on Speech
Efforts against violence are turning into restrictions on ideas.
Efforts against violence are turning into restrictions on ideas.
This includes "burning a national flag or religious texts, caricatures of religious figures, or criticism of ideologies."
Nashville’s Leah Gilliam says her vanity plate is protected by the First Amendment.
I'm serializing my new Social Media Platforms as Common Carriers? article, forthcoming in the Journal of Free Speech Law.
I finally have a presentable draft of this article, forthcoming in the Journal of Free Speech Law; I'll be posting excerpts over the next couple of weeks.
Glenn Reynolds suggests it's how that landmark decision was applied and expanded that has created the real problem.
The Court has "failed to justify our enacted policy," he wrote.
Six justices agreed that the state's "dragnet for sensitive donor information" imposes "a widespread burden on donors' associational rights."
We'll be ready to publish articles on this subject as early as September, if you submit them by August 1.
"The gravity of the privacy concerns in this [case] is further underscored by the [amicus briefs supporting the challenge].... [T]hese organizations span the ideological spectrum ...: from the [ACLU] to the Proposition 8 Legal Defense Fund; from the Council on American-Islamic Relations to the Zionist Organization of America; from Feeding America—Eastern Wisconsin to PBS Reno."
Plus: How Trump lost in 2020, Amazon seeks recusal of FTC chair, and more...
So holds a Fifth Circuit panel (by a 2-to-1 vote), in an assignment requiring the writing of the Pledge of Allegiance, but the same argument would apply, I think, to compelled statements of other ideologies, whether related to patriotism, race, sex, sexual orientation, or anything else.
The plaintiff is Francesca Viola, who wrote the comment when she was a journalism professor at Temple University.
"Bartolotti alleges that 'anytime you search [his] name on [the internet, he is] affiliated with this case,' which 'has affected [his] personal and professional lives [and] has become a safety issue at times as well.'"
The statute immunizes computer services for "action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict ... availability of material that the provider ... considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected"—but what exactly does that mean?
The suspension is based on "demonstrably false and misleading statements" that Giuliani made as Donald Trump's lawyer.
This is the case against DeRay Mckesson, brought by a police officer who was injured in a protest that Mckesson allegedly organized.
No, it’s not an attempt to monitor faculty and student views. It’s an attempt to make sure they’re allowed to express them.
A way of warning someone they might feel offended is itself offensive?
After Chinese authorities conducted newsroom raids and arrested top editors, pro-democracy publication Apple Daily realized it could no longer safely operate.
Why is straight reporting on educational reform measures so difficult.
We'll be ready to publish articles on this subject as early as September, if you submit them by August 1.
First Amendment advocates prevailed in Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.
Holding a sign in a public park should not cause an arrest.
The Court doesn't set forth a categorical rule protecting such speech, but strongly suggests that such speech is normally protected by the First Amendment—and defines political speech broadly, to include criticism (even vulgar criticism) of school programs and officials.
Advertisers found that appeasing an illiberal mob wasn’t a safe choice after all.
In many professional arenas, Wu's swings and misses would have consequences. In Wu's case, it landed him an advisory role in the Biden administration.
Plus: Biden to back bill ending crack/cocaine sentencing disparity, the truth about tech startup creation, and more...
Plus: Georgia's voting roll purge draws media hype, Florida's drug law hypocrisy, and more...
When (1) states seek to protect abortion rights / gun rights / speech rights against private restriction, and (2) Congress seeks to encourage such private restrictions by preempting the state law protections, might such federal preemption violate the Constitution?
Three states have advanced constitutionally questionable laws.
Wayne Nutt worked as an engineer for decades. But because he's not licensed, North Carolina's engineering board says that he can't share his expertise in public.