Objective vs. Subjective Inquiry in Restraining Order Based on Divorcing Spouse's Allegedly Threatening Speech
Clearly hostile, but was it threatening?
Clearly hostile, but was it threatening?
"One of the things that the left and right have in common is an awareness that our government has essentially been co-opted by corporate power," says the Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist.
The Eighth Circuit tries to rein in the criminalization of the intentional infliction of emotional distress tort.
Social media companies are eager to appease the government by suppressing disfavored speech.
An effort to ban sales of two books to minors ended with a Virginia judge saying that the state’s obscenity statute is “unconstitutional on its face."
Licensing authorities are penalizing Strong Towns founder Charles Marohn for referring to himself as a professional engineer while his license was briefly expired.
Plus: Vermont city repeals prostitution ordinance, political correctness revisited, and more...
The venerable champion of civil liberties is increasingly indistinguishable from myriad progressive advocacy groups.
A new ordinance in Franklin will restrict evening and weekend protests and subject violators to misdemeanor charges.
Perhaps Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone has the mark of a great story—everyone can find cause both to love it and to hate it.
In 1989, Iranian leader Ayatollah Khomeini called for the author and those involved in the book's publication to be put to death.
Virginia lawmakers passed a bill allowing parents to opt out of certain lessons, which was vetoed by then-Gov. Terry McAuliffe.
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board determined this week that an applicant cannot have the exclusive rights to everybody's favorite curse word.
"PM has made mistakes," tweeted Podcast Movement. "The pain caused by this one will always stick with us."
The novelist talks about The Kingdoms of Savannah and creating The Moth.
Turning terrible events into art is good, actually.
The Christian satire site's editor on defying Twitter bans, flaying Gen Z's super-thin skin, and being funny while pious.
Florida’s governor claims unconstitutional powers that could be used to promote the "far-left" policies he decries.
Kyle Mann, the Christian satire site's editor, also talks Biden vs. Trump, and why he saves his deepest burns for mega-pastors like Joel Osteen.
A panel majority holds that "reasonableness" is all that is required and upholds the Park Service's permit-and-fee requirements.
How do you justify government speech mandates? Apparently, you deliberately pretend that businesses have no right to control the messages they choose to present.
The court ruled - correctly - that the law violates the First Amendment.
As recently as 2011, a school board in Missouri barred the book from the curriculum and ordered it confined to a special section of the school's library.
The defendants, the court held, had "knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived any First Amendment rights in disclosing the information they obtained at the NAF conferences" by agreeing to that as a condition of being admitted to the conference.
The author of The Master and Margarita faced a bewildering mixture of rewards and censorship.
Ban on mandatory training of certain race topics “is a naked viewpoint-based regulation on speech.”
Plus: Federal judge halts part of Florida's Stop WOKE speech law, streaming services overtake cable, and more...