The Trump EPA's Plan to End Greenhouse Gas Emission Regulation from Stationary Sources
Instead of making a headlong rush at the endangerment finding, the Administration is adopting a more targeted deregulatory strategy.
Instead of making a headlong rush at the endangerment finding, the Administration is adopting a more targeted deregulatory strategy.
Like that in the similar case filed by Liberty Justice Center and myself, this one indicated judicial skepticism of Trump's claims to virtually unlimited power to impose tarifs.
Two decades after Granholm v. Heald was supposed to end protectionist shipping laws, states and lower courts continue to undermine the decision.
Are human courts the best venue to protect wild animals?
The participants were Amanda Shanor (Univ. of Pennsylvania), Alan Trammell (Washington and Lee), Wilfred Codrington, III (Cardozo), and myself.
It's the best shield when the executive branch tries to strong-arm private universities.
A federal judge blocks the administration's "Student Criminal Alien Initiative," which targeted foreign students who had no criminal records.
The vast majority of keys on the market contain more lead than is allowed by the state's strict new heavy metal standards.
A defense of the Supreme Court's decision to let President Trump remove members of the NLRB and MSPB.
Is it a problem if a provision requires judges to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure?
Six years after legalizing hemp and its by-products, the state is revising its drug policies and criminalizing products sold by thousands of Texas businesses.
Helicopter accidents, nasty feuds, and serial lies.
Trump’s firing of a federal agency head may soon spell doom for a New Deal era precedent that limited presidential power.
Former official Brian K. Williams just admitted that he faked a bomb threat during a work meeting. Now he faces up to 10 years in prison.
The deadlocked court doesn't provide much clarity to sticky questions about the limits of religious freedom.
Did mainstream conservatives and libertarians lose a generation of young men to the reactionary right?
Did she even read the 72-page complaint, 59-page motion for a TRO, and two-dozen exhibits?
Whether due to tariffs or because they are made in America, the result would be much higher prices.
Such removal doesn't violate the First Amendment, the Court holds by a 10-7 vote, because a public library is engaged in "government speech" by choosing which books to endorse
U.S. criminal justice policies have led to a 585 percent increase in the incarcerated women’s population since 1980 and have resulted in the highest female incarceration rate in the world.
Plus: NYC can't build a damn park, violence against diplomats, worrying news from Anthropic, and more...
The more important the product—and food certainly ranks high on any list—the better it is to allow markets to work.
To make us safer, the feds required standardized ID and one-stop shopping for identity thieves.
Even simulated entrepreneurs aren't free from the burdens of business registration fees.
Errol Morris' new Netflix documentary explores alternative theories of the Manson cult's infamous 1969 murders.
A guest post from Professor Seth Chandler.
"This means Harvard can no longer enroll foreign students and existing foreign students must transfer or lose their legal status."
"Because the Constitution vests the executive power in the President, he may remove without cause executive officers who exercise that power on his behalf, subject to narrow exceptions recognized by our precedents."
The Court "hand[s] the President the most unitary, meaning also the most subservient, administration since Herbert Hoover (and maybe ever)."
In the span of a single day, Chief Justice Roberts continues his attempts at moderation for the sake of moderation without any actual reasoning.
Criticisms of the president's alleged flip-flopping on gain-of-function research funding miss some key context.
Mark Meador thinks the Federal Trade Commission may have the legal right to investigate nonprofits that “advocate for the interests of giant corporations” if they don’t disclose their donors.
Higher debt means lower wages, higher interest rates, and fewer opportunities, says Romina Boccia of the Cato Institute.
The vote could set a dangerous precedent and empower progressive policymaking in the future.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10