Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Shooting the Messenger and Blaming the Victim

How cops, politicians, and bureaucrats tried to dodge responsibility in 2024

Jacob Sullum | 12.25.2024 12:01 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
President Joe Biden at a White House holiday reception | CNP/AdMedia/Sipa/Newscom
(CNP/AdMedia/Sipa/Newscom)

Last February, explaining why he thought Joe Biden could not be successfully prosecuted for mishandling classified documents, Special Counsel Robert Hur suggested that jurors would be apt to view the president as "a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory" and "diminished faculties." That amply supported characterization outraged Democrats, who portrayed it as a politically motivated attempt to undermine Biden's reelection.

Five months later, additional evidence of Biden's "diminished faculties" forced his withdrawal from the presidential race, showing it was Democrats' refusal to admit the obvious, not Hur's willingness to note it, that kneecapped their attempt to retain the White House. The misplaced criticism of Hur was one of the year's most audacious attempts at blame shifting. Here are some more highlights.

Felonious Joking. In January, a federal jury awarded Waylon Bailey $205,000 to compensate for the ordeal he suffered in March 2020, when a dozen sheriff's deputies wearing bulletproof vests descended on his home in Forest Hill, Louisiana, with their guns drawn, ordered him onto his knees, and arrested him for "terrorizing" the public, a felony punishable by up to 15 years in prison. The cops claimed Bailey had invited this response by posting a zombie-themed joke about COVID-19 on Facebook.

Acorn Agitation. In February, the Okaloosa County, Florida, Sheriff's Office revealed that Deputy Jesse Hernandez had resigned after emptying his gun into his own patrol car, miraculously missing a handcuffed suspect in the back seat. Although Hernandez claimed the suspect had shot at him, body camera video showed that the deputy mistook the sound of a falling acorn for gunfire.

Collision Coverage. Last February, Albuquerque Police Chief Harold Medina ran a red light and slammed his department-issued pickup truck into the side of a sports car, severely injuring the driver. Medina, who said he was fleeing from a fight between two homeless men that had escalated into gunfire, blamed "gun violence" for his reckless driving.

Prohibition Perils. In April, two months after transgender activist Cecilia Gentili died from a drug overdose, federal prosecutors blamed her dealers for causing her death by selling her heroin mixed with fentanyl. Yet that sort of hazard is a predictable result of the same laws that federal officials were enforcing, which create a black market where the composition of drugs is highly variable and unpredictable.

Marijuana Mistake. In May, based on advice from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Justice Department said marijuana does not belong in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, a category supposedly reserved for especially dangerous drugs with no medical utility. HHS blamed the Drug Enforcement Administration's erroneous reading of the law for that widely derided classification, which HHS itself supported for decades before belatedly admitting that it had no scientific basis.

Lethal Lies. During his murder trial in September, former Houston narcotics officer Gerald Goines, who lied to justify a 2019 drug raid that killed Dennis Tuttle and Rhogena Nicholas, sought to blame his victims, noting that Tuttle fired at the cops after they broke into his house and killed his dog. The jurors rejected that argument in favor of the account offered by prosecutors, who said Tuttle did not realize the intruders were police officers and reacted as "any normal person" would to a violent home invasion.

Cat Tales. When Republican vice presidential candidate J.D. Vance faced flak in September for promoting unfounded rumors about pet-eating Haitian immigrants, he said he was relying on "firsthand accounts from my constituents." In particular, he cited a report from a woman whose lost cat turned up, alive and well, in her own basement.

Retroactive Rules. Defending its rejection of flavored nicotine vaping products, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) blamed the manufacturer's failure to meet requirements that were not announced until it was too late to comply with them. The new standard, the company's lawyer told the Supreme Court in December, "directly contradicts the guidance FDA provided before the submission deadline."

© Copyright 2024 by Creators Syndicate Inc.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Housing Policy 2024: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at Reason. He is the author, most recently, of Beyond Control: Drug Prohibition, Gun Regulation, and the Search for Sensible Alternatives (Prometheus Books, September 2).

PoliticsJoe BidenElection 2024Police AbuseFirst AmendmentFree SpeechExcessive ForceAccidentsDrug PolicyWar on DrugsProhibitionBlack MarketsMarijuanaDepartment of JusticeDepartment of Health and Human ServicesDEAImmigrationJ.D. VanceFDAE-cigarettesVapingRegulation
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (66)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. charliehall   8 months ago

    All accurate but for each example given you could have given ten examples from Donald Trump.

    1. Don't look at me!   8 months ago

      Really? How many people did he kill ?

      1. Minadin   8 months ago

        Well, rhetorically, he could have killed someone in the middle of 5th Avenue. Allegedly that's a big deal. Words are violence, silence is also violence, and violent riots that include arson are mostly peaceful.

        But it wasn't as epic as when Tulsi Gabbard ended Kamala Harris's national ambitions on live TV. That was murder.

        1. Don't look at me!   8 months ago

          And racist!

          1. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   8 months ago

            They’re both non white. So which one was the racist?

            1. Don't look at me!   8 months ago

              Even more puzzling was that it was also sexist.

            2. Vernon Depner   8 months ago

              non white

              Maybe "off-white".

              1. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   8 months ago

                Eggshell?

    2. Adans smith   8 months ago

      Or any nightly news program. Not everything is about Trump you fool.

    3. sarcasmic   8 months ago

      Whatever examples you can give of Donald Trump, there's an example where a Democrat did it first, making whatever he did ok.

      1. Michael Ejercito   8 months ago

        Was it considered okay when the Democrat did it?

        There is a thing called precedent.

        1. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   8 months ago

          Sarc’s alcohol shriveled brain can’t grasp that .

        2. sarcasmic   8 months ago

          It wasn't ok when Democrats did it, and it's not ok if they do it again. But if Trump does it, whatever "it" may be, then it's ok because anyone who calls him out is a Democrat, and thus a hypocrite for doing it first. See?

          1. Don't look at me!   8 months ago

            Just stop.

            1. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   8 months ago

              He thinks this doesn't make him look like a raging hypocrite lol. And a strawman creator.

              He ignores bad dem acts even saying nobody should ever investigate them. He is the hypocrite here lol.

        3. Steevie   8 months ago

          You are just incapable of anything that isn’t stupid. So sad.

      2. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   8 months ago

        Merry Christmas, you miserable drunken pinko.

      3. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   8 months ago

        So i guess 1 day off is why you think you're rarely here. Glad you didn't change over that long day.

        Why is it impossible for you to criticize a Democrat? You claim it is the majority of your posts. Yet nobody ever see them.

      4. Scooter   8 months ago

        Poor Sarc.

        LMAO.

      5. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   8 months ago

        You just want Trump examples so you can angrily masturbate to them.

        Speaking of that, here’s Sarc……

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qR8TrgrJ-08

      6. TrickyVic (old school)   8 months ago

        Yet you don't really complain about anyone other than Trump or Trump followers.

        Recently there was an article about Biden's tariffs which you continued to talk about Trump's tariffs and did not criticize Biden's.

    4. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   8 months ago

      You.
      Are.
      Full.
      Of.
      Shit.
      Fuck off and die, asshole.

  2. Minadin   8 months ago

    Speaking of 'shooting the messenger and blaming the victim' . . .

    Anyone remember when Trump got shot? And then a few months after, some moron tried to do it again? Remember the United Healthcare CEO who was gunned down in NY a few weeks back? Left wing social media is swooning over the assassin.

    Does anyone recall any actual right-wing violence recently? Is it all just the one side that does this?

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   8 months ago

      Wait, what?! You're saying Trump was shot? I vaguely remember hearing about some popping sounds a while back. But alien drones have invaded New Jersey. New Fucking Jersey!

    2. Jerry B.   8 months ago

      Wasn’t Trump just nicked by fragments of his teleprompter screen?

      1. Don't look at me!   8 months ago

        He fell down after some loud noises were heard.

        1. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   8 months ago

          A gun had fired itself in the vicinity. Largely unrelated.

  3. MWAocdoc   8 months ago

    "Tuttle did not realize the intruders were police officers and reacted as "any normal person" would to a violent home invasion."

    AAAaaaand ... there is STILL no evidence that Tuttle fired at police officers or even had a gun in his hand or anywhere near him at the time he was gunned down. The revolver his family said he had in his bedside stand was never listed in the official inventory from the raid and was not entered into evidence at the trial where both the defense and the prosecution referred to it without objection. All of the evidence available to the public to date points to police shooting each other, the family dog and the residents.

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   8 months ago

      JS;dr but not surprised that he's still covering for the cops.

  4. AT   8 months ago

    showing it was Democrats' refusal to admit the obvious, not Hur's willingness to note it, that kneecapped their attempt to retain the White House.

    I notice you seem to have omitted the fact that their backup plan was a gibbering retard who couldn't get a single sentence out on her own if it wasn't pre-scripted under highly controlled conditions. (But you voted for her, didn't you. Admit it. Admit that you voted the gibbering retard ticket.)

    DEI, am I right?

    1. damikesc   8 months ago

      Also ignored the media participating, joyfully, in the cover-up.

  5. Peter Kreeft taught me LOGIC, BEWARE !!!!!!!   8 months ago

    I won't deny your facts but the analysis does not recur to first principles. If I can't even locally control
    --- drag queens at my daughter's school
    --- trans perverts in the ladies room
    ---filthy materials in the school library

    Is it any wonder that at higher levels things go wrong?
    REASON needs to get back on the FEDERALISM bus. You instinctively pick examples from the highest levels and solutions aimed at the highest levels. IF you must do that , go after all the folks who let a lazy, poorly-spoken, blundering incompetent pretend to be President.
    That's the view from my neighborhood

  6. sarcasmic   8 months ago

    When Republican vice presidential candidate J.D. Vance faced flak in September for promoting unfounded rumors about pet-eating Haitian immigrants, he said he was relying on "firsthand accounts from my constituents." In particular, he cited a report from a woman whose lost cat turned up, alive and well, in her own basement.

    So what? The narrative says Haitians are eating cats, so that means Haitians are eating cats. Only leftist contradict the narrative.

    1. Michael Ejercito   8 months ago

      It is not like the media never, ever promoted unfounded rumors in the past.

      1. sarcasmic   8 months ago

        Good point. It's ok when Team Trump does it because the media did it first.

        1. Don't look at me!   8 months ago

          A new idea™ !

        2. TrickyVic (old school)   8 months ago

          Well maybe if the media, and democrats quit doing it first, people wouldn't have an excuse.

          Ever thought about that?

    2. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   8 months ago

      You mean the actual citizens at a town hall and a police call on tape?

      The dem narrative is what you're pushing lol.

      Always trust dem narratives. - sarc

      Other false narratives:

      2 weeks to stop the spread
      Masks work
      Vaccines stop the spread of covid
      Venezuelan gangs aren't in Colorado
      Government isn't pushing censorship
      Steele
      Etc etc.

      Do you ever question why you end up being wrong on every topic?

      1. sarcasmic   8 months ago

        Oh, cute. Jesse got me a bunch of strawmen for Christmas. You shouldn't have!

        1. Don't look at me!   8 months ago

          Poor sarc.

        2. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   8 months ago

          How the fuck do you still not know what a strawman argument is? You use them enough. Lol.

          1. sarcasmic   8 months ago

            And some shitty gaslights too! What a generous guy!

            1. Don't look at me!   8 months ago

              Poor sarc.

            2. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   8 months ago

              Gaslight was already on the list of words you don't know.

              1. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   8 months ago

                He probably doesn’t even know the reference for the term, let alone having seen either the 1940 or 1944 films from which it’s derived.

              2. sarcasmic   8 months ago

                If you were an officer during the first world war I have no doubt you would have opened fire on your own troops on 12/25/1914.

                1. Scooter   8 months ago

                  Poor Sarc.

                  LMAO

                2. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   8 months ago

                  Your imagination does most of your thinking for you doesn't it? Amazing how you base 99% of your arguments on what you imagine others you hate might do in your head. It is quite hilarious.

                  This one is especially weird as you cheered the Capitol officer opening fire into a crowd on J6.

                  And i get your inference of me being a Russian which is even extra hilarious. Guess you watched a ww2 movie yesterday. So it consumes your knowledge for the next few days.

  7. nobody 2   8 months ago

    "Special Counsel Robert Hur suggested that jurors would be apt to view the president as "a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory" and "diminished faculties." That amply supported characterization ..."

    I've never seen any support for characterizing Biden as either sympathetic or well-meaning.

    1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   8 months ago

      They also would view him as a president

      1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   8 months ago

        Would not

  8. Wizzle Bizzle   8 months ago

    "How cops, politicians, and bureaucrats tried to dodge responsibility in 2024."

    So did most journalists. And some are still doing it, aren't they, Jake?

  9. Incunabulum   8 months ago

    The real question is - why did Trump cause all of this?

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   8 months ago

      And why was JD Vance so wrong about it.

  10. Uncle Jay   8 months ago

    "How cops, politicians, and bureaucrats tried to dodge responsibility in 2024."

    Oh, please.
    Cops, politicians and bureaucrats have been dodging responsibility for the past two centuries here in the US.
    This is not news.

  11. Vernon Depner   8 months ago

    a report from a woman whose lost cat turned up, alive and well

    She filed a police report. The story was not "unfounded".

  12. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   8 months ago

    "Shooting the Messenger and Blaming the Victim"

    And writing TDS-riddled bullshit.

  13. XM   8 months ago

    Jacob, If I died from drinking poisoned speakeasy alcohol during the prohibition, it wouldn't be "victim blaming" for the government to charge the operators for murder. Crime emanating from black market activity incentivized by government policy is still a crime. That transgender activist bought heroin for recreational purposes, not fentanyl for pain management.

    Addiction is deadly dependency resulting from overconsumption. It is by definition people not knowing their limits. You're assuming users would abide by the limits if it's "deregulated" or made reasonable. That's not how addiction works. That's not how people relying on crutches works. Outright prohibition is a wrong answer. Your way just fails in the other direction.

    If you want to argue that access to safer meds should be facilitated so people don't turn to more riskier options like fentanyl, I can buy that. But in the end lots of people will be dependent on meds. Our government isn't in trillions in debt because its people exercise discipline. At a certain point doctors will limit dosage and insurers will limit coverage to manage costs.

    It's not a problem with easy solutions. But do you kinda see the folly of admitting a gazillion unhealthy people from third world nations every year?

    1. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   8 months ago

      Sullum, and really, Reason’s staffers in general, are so obsessed with open borders that the country could collapse into a dystopian hellscape that makes Escape From New York look like Pleasantville and they wouldn’t care,

      1. AT   8 months ago

        They need brown people to mow their astroturf.

        1. Gaear Grimsrud   8 months ago

          Have you tried hiring an au pair lately? The shit is crazy. If wealthy couples don't have access to cheap immigrant labor to wipe their kid's asses they will descend into the depths of the upper middle class. The tsk tsking at Reason cocktail parties will be deafining.

          1. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   7 months ago

            I would rather lay more and import a hot Swedish au pair, like Elin Nordgren.

    2. See.More   7 months ago

      > Jacob, If I died from drinking poisoned speakeasy alcohol during the prohibition, it wouldn't be "victim blaming" for the government to charge the operators for murder...

      Uhm. Do you realize that the speakeasy alcohol poisoning was predominantly government-driven?

      https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2972336/

      But as author Deborah Blum points out, the bootleggers were but partly to blame. In 1926, the federal government, in an effort to enforce the so-called “Noble Experiment,” mandated adding poisons (including methanol) to industrial alcohol so as to discourage people from drinking it. Unfortunately, instead of leading to decreased consumption, this only resulted in more death and suffering, with the toll from that year’s Christmas celebrations reaching 23 dead and dozens more blinded in New York City alone.

      Distraught at the horror he was witnessing, Norris issued a public statement on Dec. 28, 1926, stating that “the government knows it is not stopping drinking by putting poison in alcohol. It knows what the bootleggers are doing with it and yet it continues its poisoning process, heedless of the fact that people determined to drink are daily absorbing that poison. Knowing this to be true, the United States Government must be charged with the moral responsibility for the deaths that poisoned liquor causes.” Despite public outcry and the rising death toll from poisoned alcohol (which Blum has elsewhere estimated to be approximately 10 000) this policy continued until Prohibition was repealed seven years later.

      https://www.newpaltz.edu/media/history/Loughran,%20Sean%20-%20%20Spring%202021%20Seminar%20Paper.pdf

      1. XM   7 months ago

        Yeah, but the speakeasy is still guilty of selling deadly products the government never forced them to sell.

        If Mexicans die while trying to climb trump’s walls, that’s on them.

        1. See.More   7 months ago

          Got it. Since the government poisoned and/or mandated poisoning the alcohol but didn't force anyone to drink or sell it, the government is completely faultless.

          Lick that boot harder. It's not shiny enough.

  14. TJJ2000   7 months ago

    Or maybe; Biden lost because some election integrity was ensured.
    Or even better US citizens got tired of [Na]tional So[zi]al[ism].

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Zach Cregger's Weapons Is a Horror Film That Doesn't Tell You What To Think

Peter Suderman | 8.8.2025 10:27 AM

The Occupation

Liz Wolfe | 8.8.2025 9:36 AM

Here's What Happens to the Economy if Trump Fires Jerome Powell and Installs a Loyalist at the Fed

Jared Dillian | 8.8.2025 8:15 AM

Mocking Elected Officials Is a Sign of a Healthy Democracy

Steven Greenhut | 8.8.2025 7:30 AM

Making the World Freer with Homemade Guns

J.D. Tuccille | 8.8.2025 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!