'It's Like Stockholm Syndrome': Gloria Álvarez Is Trying To Save Latin America From Socialism
"If there is freedom, private property, rule of law, then Latin Americans thrive," says the social media star.

There's a socialist wave in Latin America. Mexico, Chile, Peru, Bolivia, and Brazil recently elected leftists.
These politicians at least distance themselves from thugs like Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro, but all propose socialism-lite policies giving government more control over more people.
Why don't people in Latin America learn from the mistakes of the past? Gloria Álvarez, a social media star from Guatemala, is running for president of her country to try to educate people about the damage socialism does.
People do need educating.
"It's like Stockholm syndrome," says Álvarez in my new video. "When you ask people, 'Who should take care of health, education, football, arts, whatever?' They always answer, 'government.' How are you going to not have corruption if you leave everything in the hands of the government?"
Álvarez's campaign is based on social media. Her TikTok announcing her campaign garnered 1.5 million views.
I'd like to think I taught her how to do that. Álvarez was once a Stossel TV Fellow. I'm hiring another now.
We helped Álvarez make a video about socialism that got a remarkable 15 million views.
But she knew about socialism well before that. She went to a libertarian university, Francisco Marroquin. "One thing that they do is teach socialism and communism. They make you read Marx and Engels…. This is lacking in most national universities. People push for socialism because they don't study it."
One survey found that most millennials support socialism. But "when they were asked to define or describe socialism, none of them could!" says Álvarez. "They don't know socialism's massive failures."
How can they not? The collapse of the Soviet Union and misery in Venezuela, Nicaragua, and Cuba aren't visible enough?
Apparently not. Socialists still win elections.
"We're all part of that same mentality that the government has this magical power to control the economy, tell you how to live your life, and definitely not let you be free because you're too dumb or too poor to be responsible for your own life," says Álvarez.
"We have two different Latin Americas, the 'moochers and looters' that Ayn Rand defined in Atlas Shrugged," and then the "60 million Latin Americans who voted with their feet and live in the United States. They work and send money back home. In some countries, like Guatemala, these remittances are the number one source of income. This proves that we don't need governments to take care of our poor. If there is freedom, private property, rule of law, then Latin Americans thrive!"
But people keep failing to learn.
Chile once prospered by embracing capitalism. Their leader, Augusto Pinochet, met with Milton Friedman and other free market economists. They persuaded him to cut tariffs and taxes and to privatize state industries and Social Security. When Pinochet took over, Chile was poorer than the rest of Latin America. Adopting free markets soon made Chile the richest country.
Unfortunately, Pinochet was also a vicious dictator who murdered opponents. His cruelty has allowed leftists to smear economic freedom ever since.
"You cannot enforce free markets through a dictatorship," says Álvarez.
Recently Chile elected a leftist president, Gabriel Boric. He wants to abolish the private pension funds that helped make Chile richer! He wants free public transport, universal health care, higher taxes on the rich, and to end student debt. A national vote to adopt a progressive constitution was defeated, but he'll return with similar plans.
"If you don't keep educating new generations in the philosophical aspect of why individual freedoms are sacred," says Álvarez, "eventually you will have a generation with material wealth that forgets the importance of these values, and then they go out and say, 'Let's have socialism!'"
That's why she keeps making videos.
Her presidential campaign is really just an education campaign, since at 38, she is two years too young to legally become president in Guatemala.
But I'm glad she's spreading the word.
"Freedom implies…that nobody else makes decisions for you," says Álvarez. "People don't like freedom. They like their populist messiah promising them bullshit."
COPYRIGHT 2023 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
One thing that seems to be an eternal truth, but one that we seem to have to keep re-learning is that you cannot save people from themselves. One thing that might still be possible is for us to save ourselves from the socialists. Although I remain optimistic in the long run about liberty, in the short run it is very likely that we will have to resort to force in self-defense.
"There's a socialist wave in Latin America."
I wonder why? Compare the response to covid19 under Trump in capitalist America to that of AMLO's socialist Mexico. Which would you prefer?
What about "socialist" Sweden?
"What about “socialist” Sweden?"
Clearly not enough Latin Americans.
"...Compare the response to covid19 under Trump..."
Stupid sumbitch can't spell "Biden" can he?
I like how he’s pretending that he was opposed to the lockdowns.
Nobody's sneaking in to Mexico except to pass through.
I wonder why? Compare the response to covid19 under Trump in capitalist America to that of AMLO’s socialist Mexico.
Should I start with the hundreds of thousands FLEEING the response of AMLO’s socialist Mexico?
Dolt.
Which of AMLO's covid policies were hundreds of thousands fleeing? The response under Trump was heavy handed, ill conceived, unpopular and Americans are still complaining about it. Mexico was a different story. You should look into it if you are curious. You will be surprised. Look at Vietnam's covid response. A communist country with one of the world's most effective responses to covid.
Note: Vietnam, like Sweden, is not a Latin American country.
Sounds familiar.
Except kids these days don't realise how much they have because they're surrounded by people who have as much as if not more than them.
Unfortunately, Pinochet was also a vicious dictator who murdered opponents. His cruelty has allowed leftists to smear economic freedom ever since.
But he had to be, or the leftists (who would smear economic freedom just as much anyway) would have gotten in sooner. As soon as he realized trying to defend against their predation would’ve subjected the country to widespread violence, he surrendered. He didn’t try to hang on in spite. But up to that point, it appeared the leftists could be defeated by killing only small numbers of them, so he did. I’d’ve done it too if I’d been in his situation. What’s the matter, isn’t the (temporary) boss allowed to operate the wood chipper?
They'd call most of us vicious dictators too if we ever acted on our desires. The righteous are righteous only when they're the losers.
I keep forgetting it strips the tags when you edit a posted comment. That's OK, you know the first paragraph's a quote from the article.
I’d’ve done it too if I’d been in his situation. What’s the matter, isn’t the (temporary) boss allowed to operate the wood chipper?
They’d call most of us vicious dictators too if we ever acted on our desires. The righteous are righteous only when they’re the losers.
Then again, you’re the ditz who said it was all right to submit to the horrors of slavery to avoid the horrors of war, even though your master, being your absolute owner, could subject you to the horrors of war anyway.
Read Patrick Henry’s famous speech for the first time in your miserable life! That man was a believer who was willing to sass back to his own God to be free!
Uh, no. What Pinochet did was not compatible or cromulent with Libertarianism and when Milton Friedman found out about Pinochet’s atrocities, Friedman rejected the Honoraria from Pinochet’s Government!
Means and ends have to be all of a single piece. You ultimately cannot have a free society with practices incompatible with a free society.
Save the woodchipper for making confetti out of regulations and save the helicopter to dispense the confetti for the ticker-tape parade!
Unfortunately, Pinochet was also a vicious dictator who murdered opponents.
Fortunately, Pinochet was a patriotic leader who understood that you have to violently rid yourself of leftist opponents.
FTFY
Only if the Leftist opponents initiate force.
FTFM? No, FTFY!
"If there is freedom, private property, rule of law"
How dare you impose your colonial, patriarchal, white privilege on oppressed brown people!
People should give up on their wet dreams of South American prosperity. It ain’t gonna happen. Chile elected a “student Leader” socialist millennial as president because their bus fares went up. Argentina re-elected Peronist Christine Kirchner to the vice presidency. Brazil re-elected Luna. The opposition to the fucked up socialists in Venezuela are SOCIALISTS! The Latinx stinx. They are the worst combination of Spanish Conquistador and MesoAmerican culture. Either build a wall or widen the Panama canal a couple of hundred miles.
" How are you going to not have corruption if you leave everything in the hands of the government?"
You're not?
How not to be a [Na]tional So[zi]alist fan....
1) What separates Government from any run of the mill business?
A: Legal Gun-Force.
2) What asset to humanity does Gun-Force have?
A: To Ensure a Free and Just Society.
Then Why/How in the F is a Gun suppose to make sh*t?
Oh yeah; That's right -- human slavery.....
Common-sense a 1st grader could understand and common-sense that gets whipped away by BS narratives and fairy tale excuses of the Gun packing criminal GREEDY who project like nobodies business and name-calls anyone against their GREEDY robbery 'GREEDY'.
Compulsively choosing a GUN ("threatening the life of others") to get things done; doesn't make anyone better than any common criminal. The 'legal' Gov-Gun is no exception in fact it's worse.
The monopoly of Gun-force (i.e. 'government') was established to be used DEFENSIVELY not Aggressively/Progressively. Choose the proper tool for the job else suffer the destruction of this nation turning into a filthy gangland-gun controlled society no-one wants to be a part of.
Stossel... Still the best-by-far writer/libertarian at Reason!!!
Much of Latin America seem to be victims of zero-sum thinking - which I think is at the heart of many people's advocating or approval of socialism. And their susceptibility to authoritarianism may be explained, per an article in the Economist of many years ago, by their Catholicism, which is significantly more authoritarian in principle than Protestantism.
Well since Gov-Gun theft doesn't make sh*t...
In that mindset it is a zero-sum equation... One that has been experienced over and over again by socialist nations. One can only conquer and consume so much before it's all gone.
Socialism is a self sustaining demise.
Self-un-sustaining, surely? 😉
Online, Google paid $45 per hour. Nine months have passed since my close relative last had a job, but in the previous month she earned $10500 by working 8 hours a day from home. Now is the time for everyone to try this job by using this website…
Click the link—↠ http://Www.Smartjob1.com