Imagining a World Without Qualified Immunity, Part I
What impact would abolishing qualified immunity have on civil rights litigation, police misconduct, and government accountability?
What impact would abolishing qualified immunity have on civil rights litigation, police misconduct, and government accountability?
Hard to see what President Trump was referring to with regard to the New York Times story with new allegations about Justice Kavanaugh.
New Mexico will apparently now be the only state in which spouses may generally testify about confidential statements made during the marriage.
If a state criminal conviction leads to denial of gun rights under state law (not just federal law), the defendant must be given the option of a jury trial, rules the Nevada Supreme Court.
A patronized president, a campaign of emotional torture, and a utterly unqualified forensics expert.
Resources for teaching and civic education
How Trump Could Muzzle Naturalized Citizens
What do we make of the Department of Commerce leak? And did Justice Sotomayor lose the majority opinion in Gundy?
Episode 6 of Free Speech Rules, from UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh
The ban on online speech intended to and reasonably likely to (among other things) "annoy," the court says, is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad.
The concerns I expressed about her record on property rights when I testified at her 2009 confirmation hearing were justified. But she has compiled an admirable record on several other issues.
Liability safe harbors for Internet intermediaries are not responsible for Internet "hate speech"
I had not known that!
Under Colorado law, the decree stripped a juvenile court of the jurisdiction over an attempt to terminate the parents' parental rights.
"The Court has found[] no case to support the proposition that an employer has a duty to fire an employee in a way that will not interfere with her future employment opportunities or to provide her with a letter of recommendation."
You don't want to explain to your clients why a court would say something like this in its opinion.
Avoid motions "for Leave to File Under Seal Any and All Documents and Depositions Cited in Support of Any Motion, Response, Reply, or Appendix Filed by the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant."
Historian Stephen Davies provides a good explanation of why fringe "cultic milieu" ideas are growing in influence. It's a troubling development, but not one that should lead us to categorically abjure non-mainstream political ideas.
Though Fordham is a private university, under New York law private university decisions that violate the universities' own stated rules may be set aside by a court.
So holds a Second Circuit panel this morning.
Tools exist to modify the incentives for legislative action, and Congress could deploy some of those tools itself to encourage more regular reauthorization and modernization of federal regulatory programs.
The El Paso shooter's combination of anti-capitalism, bigotry, and xenophobic nationalism highlights the dangers of zero-sum thinking on left and right. His worldview resembles that of the perpetrator of a similar attack in New Zealand earlier this year. Sadly, these ideas are not confined to a few extremists.
The parents of two suicide victims blame the university, the ABK fraternity, and an allegedly death-obsessed frat brother
... no matter the politician's race, sex, or religion, and no matter whether the speaker owns a gun store.
Full-body banana costumes, in-state grapes, and apple pie.
The case was brought on the family's behalf by the Institute for Justice, a prominent public interest law firm.
Will the courts ever be willing to curb excessive delegation? If not, could Congress learn to constrain itself?
The Supreme Court reined in Auer deference. Will lower court get the message?
Like in the Emoluments Clauses cases, plaintiff’s mere allegation that the government is acting ultra vires is not enough to establish an equitable cause of action
Justice Gorsuch was right to rely on her account of Schechter Poultry in "The Forgotten Man"
I am hiring a new special assistant/counsel at the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights gets it wrong on school discipline.
Something for incoming 1Ls, and for others interested in studying law.
Episode 274 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
The Sixth Circuit suggests an important limit on the Supreme Court's Nieves precedent, though it doesn't decide the question.
The Sixth Circuit expresses concern that such bans may be unconstitutionally vague or overbroad.
The parodist was arrested for "unlawfully impair[ing] the department's functions," but was acquitted; the Sixth Circuit just let the parodist's lawsuit against the city proceed.
I use my CUNY protest to assess how the First Amendment—and broader principles of free speech—should treat the heckler’s veto on today’s college campuses.