Democrats Try To Hide a $3 Trillion Tax Increase From Voters
The plan would make a liar out of Biden on a level reminiscent of George H.W. Bush's betrayal of his "read my lips" tax pledge.
The plan would make a liar out of Biden on a level reminiscent of George H.W. Bush's betrayal of his "read my lips" tax pledge.
Plus: Vaccine mandates are popular, Texas versus free speech, and more...
The agency's decisions so far reflect a bias against the flavored e-liquids that former smokers overwhelmingly prefer.
Instead of trusting the science, the FDA will treat adults like children.
Undue emphasis on unproven risks to youth may have undermined efforts to control smoking, costing lives in the process.
Government and the media aren't paying attention to the relative benefits of vaping over smoking tobacco.
Legislators cannot have it both ways.
Officials publicly congratulate themselves for protecting teens, but they know that they’re prodding young people to switch to cigarettes.
The pervasive anti-vaping narrative at the beginning of the pandemic had real consequences.
Further evidence that well-intentioned regulation of vaping products can have negative consequences for public health.
If public health scolds get their way, they will worsen the nation’s overcriminalization problem.
America's public health officials continue to undermine public health.
The law bans mail delivery of vaping products and requires all vendors to comply with burdensome tax reporting rules.
The industry's fate depends on the whims of an agency charged with deciding what is "appropriate for public health."
Bay State officials expect a new ban on flavored tobacco products to benefit illegal suppliers.
Plus: More (bad, weird, and occasionally good) new state laws that start taking effect today.
The agency's scaremongering about e-cigarettes undermined its credibility on the eve of a true public health crisis.
The great state of New Jersey idiotically compares vaping to jumping out of an airplane without a parachute.
The proposal is parodying, not endorsing, the nanny state.
In the panic to ban and regulate electronic cigarettes, media and politicians are ignoring the benefits of vaping.
The government and the press focus on newfangled contraptions instead of drug-related harm.
The legislation would also prevent those under 21 from purchasing vaping products.
Another empirical study finds a substitution effect between vaping and smoking
The court was correct to reject most of the arguments, but was too dismissive of the First Amendment concerns.
The Science article is a wake-up call for people who claim to be concerned about smoking-related disease and death.
A new review essay in Science warns of the dangers of prohibitionist thinking
The agency’s indifference between smoking and vaping is scientifically indefensible.
Although the CDC is now emphasizing the potential hazards of vitamin E acetate, it continues to warn the public about e-cigarettes that don't contain it.
The House is simultaneously advancing bills that would legalize marijuana and ban the vast majority of vaping products.
Even if the FDA does not ban flavors, its regulations will soon drive most vaping businesses and products from the market.
The distinction the presidential adviser draws between e-cigarettes and other vaping devices contradicts the FDA's understanding of its authority.
The ban's supporters falsely claim that "a whole generation of young people" is "addicted to these products."
An analysis of survey data finds that pre-existing differences entirely explain the association between e-cigarette use and current smoking among teenagers.
A new poll suggests it does—and campaign officials agree, leading the administration to consider exempting more flavors.
The FDA finally has agreed to allow a mild statement about the relative hazards of snus and cigarettes.
The company says it will sell only tobacco, mint, and menthol pods unless and until the FDA officially approves other varieties.
Democratic legislators ignore the tremendous harm-reducing potential of smoke-free nicotine delivery.
Vague lung disease warnings tar harm-reducing e-cigarettes while obscuring the role of black-market cannabis products.
A new study indicates that heavy vaping remains rare among teenagers who don't smoke.
The latest findings highlight the irrationality of banning legal e-cigarettes that deliver nicotine.
Citing respiratory diseases associated with black-market THC products, the state is banning legal e-cigarettes that are far less hazardous than the conventional kind.
Contrary to the evidence, public health officials and journalists continue to link the recent outbreak of respiratory illnesses with legal e-cigarettes.
"Vaping is a health miracle to me," said ex-smoker Vicki Porter. "Not safe, but less harmful."
If that confusion drives vapers back to smoking or discourages others from making the switch, it will have deadly consequences.
The real "public health crisis" is not underage vaping but the one that Michigan, New York, and the FDA are about to create.
Banning the flavors that former smokers overwhelmingly prefer is a strange way to protect public health.
Pending restrictions on vaping products in Michigan and New York are based on an alarmingly broad understanding of the executive branch's "public health" authority.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks