Supreme Court Orders Government To Fund $12 Billion Obamacare Bailout
The ruling says health insurers are owed money that Congress never appropriated.
The ruling says health insurers are owed money that Congress never appropriated.
No one will ever head to Walmart for a kidney transplant, but retail companies and profit-based clinics certainly can offer high-quality, lower-level services—and impose market discipline in a sector that sorely needs it.
My take on today's decision to consider the Obamacare severability case.
The ruling by a closely divided court leaves in place a December panel decision in this important case - at least for now.
The justices declined a Democratic request to fast track a decision on the law.
The elimination of three health care taxes will increase the deficit by $373 billion.
The shifting understanding of the requirement to buy health insurance elevates form above substance.
Biden's reputation as a bipartisan dealmaker might be appealing in these polarized times, but his record as a policy maker is atrocious.
Plus: States sue to stop Equal Rights Amendment, French sex workers take prostitution laws to E.U. court of human rights, and more...
The appellate court remanded the most important issue in the case back to the district court. But its instructions will make it difficult for the trial judge to again rule that the entire Affordable Care Act must fall with the individual mandate.
A decade after Obamacare, the Democratic Party has embraced health care radicalism.
DOJ (Quietly) Prefers Justice Thomas’s Approach from Murphy v. NCAA: Only Enjoin the Provisions that Injure the Plaintiffs
The Structure of NFIB v. Sebelius: Parts III.A, III.B, III.C, and III.D
If the Private Plaintiffs in NFIB v. Sebelius were injured by the mandate, then the Private Plaintiffs in Texas v. U.S. are injured by the mandate
The Kentucky senator wants the Senate to consider offsetting spending cuts before approving limitless, automatic spending for the rest of the century.
The cost of single-payer would dwarf the price of Obamacare.
Biden is framing his new plan as a defense of Obamacare. It's not.
Severability doctrine & the ACA findings seem to support Judge O'Connor's ruling
An important element of standing has already been decided by the Court
Understanding NFIB v. Sebelius
A new Congressional Budget Office report shows the consequences of undoing Trump-era rules on less regulated health coverage.
The new plan is likely to resemble an old plan that was barely a plan at all.
This is selective enforcement of the law for political purposes.
It's an attempt to make an end-run around congressional spending authority.
In 2019, it's liberals, not conservatives, who are holding the pill hostage for political gain.
Plus: Libertarians face resistance while picking up trash without a permit, and Trump imagines Sen. Warren at the Wounded Knee massacre.
Trump's shutdown is a temporary, political fight that won't save any money or reduce the size of government.
Under the health law, Medicare started penalizing hospitals for too many readmissions. Now mortality rates are up.
[A guest-post by Prof. Josh Blackman (South Texas College of Law), a noted expert on Obamacare-related litigation. -EV]
The judge was right to conclude that the individual health insurance mandate is now unconstitutional, but wrong to rule that the rest of the ACA is now unlawful because it can't be severed from the largely toothless mandate left in place under the 2017 GOP tax bill.
The ruling will almost certainly be appealed.
Premiums are down and choice is up after Republican tweaks to the Affordable Care Act.
The Obamacare contraception mandate is getting a Trump-era overhaul.
The White House plans to import foreign prescription-drug socialism to the United States.
The biggest shock from yesterday's midterms was that everything went more or less as expected.
At an election-eve campaign rally, Trump all but defends the health law he tried to repeal.
Instead of justifying the GOP position on pre-existing conditions, Trump and other Republicans are trying to confuse people.
Turns out voters like the Democratic health law...when it's run by Republicans.
In a new op-ed attacking single-payer, Trump inadvertently reveals that he's in favor of socialism-as long as it's for his supporters.
His true impact may be less about transforming the Court's ideology, and more about altering its status in political life.
Plus: Kavanaugh confirmation is official and child care tax credits backfire.
New Census data shows little change from 2016.
Clinton runs with a Kamala Harris whopper that's already been debunked.
While president, Obama was a single-payer critic. Out of office, he thinks it's the wave of the future.
Rules and regulations intended to reform health care are driving private practices out of business by overconfident design.
Trump's SCOTUS nominee probably won't have an impact on Obamacare. But that won't stop Democrats from making the argument.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks