Copying the Federal RFRA Won't Make Much Difference in Arkansas
The changes demanded by the governor do not rule out a defense in discrimination cases.
The changes demanded by the governor do not rule out a defense in discrimination cases.
The fundamental question is whether marriage recognition is actually a right.
Indiana is free to look the other way in the face of discrimination based on sexual orientation. But they are not free to encourage it or to make it lawful.
Vendors who object to same-sex marriage could be forced to participate in gay weddings.
Inviting the state to tread on anti-gay bakers is a pernicious distraction that betrays the principles of a free society.
He is abusing business boycotts
Why shouldn't RFRAs apply to private lawsuits?
Both conservatives and liberals aren't being straight about the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
Disputes about birth control and gay marriage undermine bipartisan support for religious freedom.
Paul Speaks of Basic Individual Rights, Slammed for Allegedly Not Believing in "Behavioral Rights."
Indiana's governor calls for a RFRA amendment clarifying that the law does not authorize anti-gay discrimination.
What the law actually says is mostly irrelevant in our cultural climate.
The famous fashion designers are gay but oustpoken critics of gay parents and IVF children.
Harris seeks permission not to prepare it for signature-gathering.
No, SB101 will not result in public safety workers refusing to do their jobs.
Lawyer prepares initiative; state may have to let him collect signatures.
Sometimes cultural shifts take 20 years.
Equal numbers say it is and isn't. Whether that will help Ben Carson remains to be seen.
Supreme Court Will Hear Arguments April 28.
Or so gay-friendly conservatives hope
The right will be gay friendly and libertarian... one day soon.
Ban on new protections nothing like a religious freedom act.
In Michigan, a more serious case of anti-gay discrimination ends peacefully without lawyers.
When the down-low panic came to Law and Order: SVU
Majority believes businesses should not be required to provide goods, services.
State rules religious shop owners discriminated against couple.
Bigotry or breach of contract? What should have been done?
Does it matter, under the law, whether the baker agrees with the sentiment?
Frank Bruni, New York Times columnist, doesn't seem to understand the First Amendment very well.
The most permissive approach to gay unions in Southeast Asia
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks