Biden and Trump Are Both Disastrously Wrong About Tariffs
Yes, cheap imports hurt some American companies. But protectionist trade policy harms many more Americans than it helps.
Yes, cheap imports hurt some American companies. But protectionist trade policy harms many more Americans than it helps.
Hacktivist-journalist Barrett Brown sets out to settle scores in his new memoir.
Plus: A listener asks whether Bruce Springsteen's song Born in the U.S.A is actually patriotic.
And the Supreme Court agrees to weigh in.
Even as he praises judicial decisions that made room for "dissenters" and protected "robust political debate," Tim Wu pushes sweeping rationales for censorship.
The Court is remanding these two cases for more analysis—but it made its views on some key issues clear.
China's free speech record is bad, but the federal government's isn't so great either.
The senior Republican FCC commissioner blames progressive politics, while lawmakers and telecom companies blame bureaucratic red tape.
A year after a court told Maryland police that Cellebrite searches were too broad, Baltimore quietly resumed using the software.
X's child porn detection system doesn’t violate an Illinois biometric privacy law, the judge ruled.
Plus: Ex-NSA chief joins forces with OpenAI, conscription squads hunt Ukrainian draft-dodgers, and more...
Officials suspend efforts to force X to suppress the world’s access to video of a crime.
Don’t unleash censors; restrain them more!
New bipartisan legislation would sunset Section 230 after next year.
OnlyFans lets women distribute their own porn. Artificial intelligence will give them even more control.
OnlyFans let women distribute their own porn. Artificial intelligence will give them even more control.
Congress is "silencing the 170 million Americans who use the platform to communicate," the company argues.
How the Backpage prosecution helped create a playbook for suppressing online speech, debanking disfavored groups, and using "conspiracy" charges to imprison the government's targets
At least eight states have already enacted age-verification laws, and several more are considering bills.
Net neutrality rules have been instituted and repealed multiple times in the past 15 years, and yet internet use has thrived in each scenario.
Plus: Homework liberation in Poland, Orthodox rabbi tells students to flee Columbia, toddler anarchy, and more...
"Profound irreparable harm flows from the Act's chilling of adults' access to protected sexual expression," the filing reads.
An interview with Consumer Choice Center Deputy Director Yaël Ossowski.
The push to regulate social media content infringes on rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment.
Kentucky's governor signed a law last week that could require porn sites to ask for users' government IDs before allowing access to adult material.
A Section 702 reauthorization moving through Congress could actually weaken privacy protections.
Only 22 of the 476 studies in The Anxious Generation contain data on either heavy social media use or serious mental issues among adolescents, and none have data on both.
Round 3 in the debate between Hamburger and Somin over the First Amendment and Murthy
The law would require platforms to use invasive measures to prevent most teenagers under 16 from making social media accounts and bar all minors from sexually explicit sites.
Modern cars are smartphones on wheels, but with less protection for your data.
The problem is the users, not the apps.
Online sports betting companies are using the same legal playbook that once threatened their operations to eliminate competitors.
The company leaves Texas over an “ineffective, haphazard, and dangerous” age-verification law.
Instead of freeing Americans from censorship, the TikTok bill would tighten the U.S. government's control over social media.
Another blow to the idea that algorithms are driving our political dysfunction.
"Laws like this don't solve the problems they try to address but only make them worse," says a Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression attorney.
A new bill would ban TikTok and give the president power to declare other social media apps off limits.
A law forcing kids off social media sites is still likely coming to Florida.
A federal judge in an ongoing case called the porn age-check scheme unconstitutional. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton doesn't seem to care.
Supreme Court arguments about two social media laws highlight a dangerous conflation of state and private action.
Maybe the problem for teens isn't screens, but what they are replacing.
The Supreme Court seems inclined to recognize that content moderation is protected by the First Amendment.
Both states are trying to force tech companies to platform certain sorts of speech.
"None of these laws prevent kids from viewing anything. They just prevent kids from posting," argues Shoshana Weissmann.
Banning people under age 16 from accessing social media without parental consent "is a breathtakingly blunt instrument" for reducing potential harms, the judge writes.
Sen. Mike Lee's "technological exploitation" bill also redefines consent.
Maybe the problem for teens isn't screens, but what they are replacing.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10