TikTok Asks Court To Declare Ban Unconstitutional
Congress is "silencing the 170 million Americans who use the platform to communicate," the company argues.
Congress is "silencing the 170 million Americans who use the platform to communicate," the company argues.
How the Backpage prosecution helped create a playbook for suppressing online speech, debanking disfavored groups, and using "conspiracy" charges to imprison the government's targets
At least eight states have already enacted age-verification laws, and several more are considering bills.
Net neutrality rules have been instituted and repealed multiple times in the past 15 years, and yet internet use has thrived in each scenario.
Plus: Homework liberation in Poland, Orthodox rabbi tells students to flee Columbia, toddler anarchy, and more...
"Profound irreparable harm flows from the Act's chilling of adults' access to protected sexual expression," the filing reads.
An interview with Consumer Choice Center Deputy Director Yaël Ossowski.
The push to regulate social media content infringes on rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment.
Kentucky's governor signed a law last week that could require porn sites to ask for users' government IDs before allowing access to adult material.
A Section 702 reauthorization moving through Congress could actually weaken privacy protections.
Only 22 of the 476 studies in The Anxious Generation contain data on either heavy social media use or serious mental issues among adolescents, and none have data on both.
Round 3 in the debate between Hamburger and Somin over the First Amendment and Murthy
The law would require platforms to use invasive measures to prevent most teenagers under 16 from making social media accounts and bar all minors from sexually explicit sites.
Modern cars are smartphones on wheels, but with less protection for your data.
The problem is the users, not the apps.
Online sports betting companies are using the same legal playbook that once threatened their operations to eliminate competitors.
The company leaves Texas over an “ineffective, haphazard, and dangerous” age-verification law.
Instead of freeing Americans from censorship, the TikTok bill would tighten the U.S. government's control over social media.
Another blow to the idea that algorithms are driving our political dysfunction.
"Laws like this don't solve the problems they try to address but only make them worse," says a Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression attorney.
A new bill would ban TikTok and give the president power to declare other social media apps off limits.
A law forcing kids off social media sites is still likely coming to Florida.
A federal judge in an ongoing case called the porn age-check scheme unconstitutional. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton doesn't seem to care.
Supreme Court arguments about two social media laws highlight a dangerous conflation of state and private action.
Maybe the problem for teens isn't screens, but what they are replacing.
The Supreme Court seems inclined to recognize that content moderation is protected by the First Amendment.
Both states are trying to force tech companies to platform certain sorts of speech.
"None of these laws prevent kids from viewing anything. They just prevent kids from posting," argues Shoshana Weissmann.
Banning people under age 16 from accessing social media without parental consent "is a breathtakingly blunt instrument" for reducing potential harms, the judge writes.
Sen. Mike Lee's "technological exploitation" bill also redefines consent.
Maybe the problem for teens isn't screens, but what they are replacing.
Interest in virtual private networks provides insights into a global battle over digital freedom.
A new letter from Sen. Ron Wyden (D–Ore.) reveals that the agency admitted the practice nearly three years ago but would not allow him to reveal it.
Social media influencer Caroline Calloway might not be a reliable narrator, but Scammer is an honest memoir nevertheless.
Laws like Utah's would require anyone using social media to prove their age through methods such as submitting biometric data or a government-issued ID.
It's a frightening reminder of how far the government will go to get their way—and to warn tech companies against platforming speech it doesn't like.
It's Super Size Me for internet intellectuals.
Free societies generally leave these matters to individuals and families.
In an era when X (formerly Twitter) is blamed for all the ills of the world, here's a case where it did good.
The errors are so glaring that it's hard not to suspect an underlying agenda at work here.
Stanford's Jay Bhattacharya debates St. John University's Kate Klonick on the federal government's role in social media censorship.
Some Substack writers are pressuring the platform to change its moderation policies. Others are urging Substack not to listen.
"It's not really a movement. Nobody is pushing it. People are just living it."
Stanford's Jay Bhattacharya debates St. John University's Kate Klonick on the federal government's role in social media censorship.
The former journalist defends misinformation in the Trump era and explains why so many journalists are against free speech.
The ban, scheduled to take effect on January 1, is likely unconstitutional in multiple ways, the judge held.
The mere act of publishing sex ads online is enough to send most potential free speech allies scurrying for the exits.