Holder Supports Requiring Warrants to Access Emails
Presumably with plenty of abuseable exceptions
Presumably with plenty of abuseable exceptions
Transparently control-freaky
It wasn't me! It was the Deputy AG!
Which wouldn't seem all that "unfettered"
Architect of the growing security state?
Is there a rule of threes for scandals?
Oh, that's not disturbing at all
Civil liberties, now despised by both major parties
Fourth Amendment, remember?
That's some good encryption, but Cupertino can get bypass it for the cops
Accuses officials of ever-shifting rationales for the practice
All your email are belong to us
That's B&E and battery to you and me
Clearly, an effective barrier to excessive nosiness
White House wants legislation enacted that will punish Internet service providers who fail to cooperate with FBI requests and court orders.
That's not how "public safety exception" works
The Empire will crush the resistance
What is this "warrant" of which you speak?
Bill extending Fourth Amendment to all electronic documents goes to the Senate for a vote.
A little love for the Fourth Amendment
And one reason why it should.
Police investigate guy for no reason at all
No Miranda Rights for Dzhokhar
In related news, tax audits of members of Congress skyrocketed ...
America needs more judges like this guy.
Do you seriously trust the IRS?
Does it have to be dimmer than a judge?
Well, they probably read them before you sent them
What are you hiding? Oh ... that.
Federal agents have been dinged for the same courtroom games
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10