Gorsuch Warns About Executive Overreach While Expanding Trump's Power
The Supreme Court extended presidential control over federal agencies. What could go wrong?
The Supreme Court extended presidential control over federal agencies. What could go wrong?
Understanding Chatrie v. United States.
Washington’s troops won the ground war, but today's left and right are waging war on the ideals of the Revolution.
War making in "the power of a single man" is not what the Founders intended.
Understanding the stakes of Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections.
The conservative justice continues to wage a lonely legal crusade over the Commerce Clause.
A landmark win for the right to keep and bear arms in United States v. Hemani.
Understanding the stakes in Kian v. Florida
The man known only as "A Farmer" warned against the "sword of government."
The proposal was nixed only after White House Staff Secretary Will Scharf explained why it was legally dubious.
The family's attorney says it's the largest settlement for a dog shooting case in Colorado history.
How a four-decade-old dissent may now help the president fire independent federal agency heads at will
Civil liberties groups say recording the police is core First Amendment activity. The Right to Record Act of 2026 would create a right to sue federal officers who violate it.
Behind Japan's economic success lies a government and legal system that clearly prioritize social stability and group harmony over individual rights.
The American Civil Liberties Union is asking a judge to block the Memphis Safe Task Force from retaliating against anyone who exercises their First Amendment right to record the police.
Damon Root discusses the path to emancipation, the struggle to secure freedom after the Civil War, and the constitutional changes that remade America.
Plus: a few words about my new book
The president’s habitual attempts to criminalize dissent hark back to tyrants of yore.
The two judicial conservatives continue to disappoint criminal justice reform advocates.
He famously said the Founders had created "a republic, if you can keep it." How have we kept it? And can we continue?
Vicki Baker is more fortunate than several other similarly situated victims. But it took a very long time to get there.
Lifetime tenure for federal judges has been the constitutional practice since ratification.
Should it take more than a 5–4 vote for the Supreme Court to strike down a federal law?
Leo Garcia Venegas and the Institute for Justice are suing to block immigration raids on private construction sites that target Latinos.
Plus: A "supremely cringe" viral tweet about the Supreme Court
Neil Gorsuch's new book reminds us that to accelerate progress, we must first acknowledge the progress that has already occurred.
The Dissident Right is furious with Neil Gorsuch for saying America is a creedal nation. That just goes to show how out of touch its obsessions are.
From immigration and guns to executive power, transgender athletes, and mail-in ballots, these are the Supreme Court cases to watch out for in May and June.
The justice defends the Supreme Court as a model of respectful and principled adjudication.
Congress hasn't voted to declare war since 1942, yet the legislative branch constantly refuses to rein in presidents.
The Supreme Court justice discusses the Declaration of Independence, how unchecked power threatens liberty, and what the Founders can teach future generations.
Plus: The Supreme Court says “demands for a charity’s private member or donor information” raises First Amendment problems.
The government wants access to millions of cell phone location histories. The Supreme Court will decide what the Fourth Amendment allows.
Plus: Does Trump expect to lose the birthright citizenship case?
Democrats can't muster the votes to impeach and remove Trump, or even to stop an illegal war. The 25th Amendment would be even more difficult.
Remembering the infuriating case of United States v. “The Spirit of ’76.”
Plus: The Alito retirement rumors keep swirling.
How the digital privacy rights of millions are at stake in Chatrie v. United States.
Understanding the Supreme Court’s decision in Chiles v. Salazar.
There is no voting crisis that demands federal intervention.
Understanding the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara.
Understanding the stakes in Trump v. Barbara.
A war by any other name must still be authorized by Congress.
Two different pieces of legislation aim to create state workarounds to the procedural quagmire of federal civil rights litigation.
What’s at stake in Watson v. Republican National Committee.
“Officers don’t have the blanket authority to arrest anyone who runs from them,” says an attorney from the Institute for Justice.
New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change. Out now for subscribers.