There's No Such Thing as 'Free Money' or Meaningless Deficits
As debt soars, federal payments to service the debt will crowd out the government's core spending responsibilities.
As debt soars, federal payments to service the debt will crowd out the government's core spending responsibilities.
CNN doesn't think Americans deserve to hear potential presidents asked about the national debt.
Members of Congress are well aware of the looming threat of the $22 trillion (and growing) national debt, but seem incapable of doing anything except making it worse.
Trump's 2018 commitment that he would never sign a massive spending deal ever again was fake news.
The House Freedom Caucus could reverse its trend towards irrelevancy by successfully swaying Trump to turn against the new budget deal.
If President Donald Trump signs the deal into law, he will have authorized a 22 percent increase in federal discretionary spending during his first term in office.
The federal government will spend $57 trillion over the next 10 years and run an $11 trillion deficit. But cutting spending by $150 billion is too much to ask?
The pundit heavily criticized President Obama for excessive spending. Now he says it doesn't matter.
The national debt will hit 140 percent of GDP before the end of the 2040s, and that's the optimistic scenario.
Paul's proposal to cut 2 percent from the federal budget for the next five years was predictably opposed by both Democrats and most Republicans
America will face "serious economic, security, and social challenges" if the national debt keeps growing at this rate.
The feds are $234 billion in the red. Looking for hope? Sen. Mike Enzi has some ideas.
A new record, but one that won't stand for long.
From OMB head Mick Mulvaney to former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, nobody cares about spending money we don't have on things we don't need. Big mistake.
Unless we make some big changes, things won't get much better.
You can't have it both ways.
Ryan presided over three years of growing deficits and laid the groundwork for worse to come.
As long as Medicare, Social Security, and the Pentagon can't be touched, it's hard to believe the president has discovered his inner fiscal hawk.
At this rate we'll get there before the end of the century.
Trump blaming the budget deficit on hurricanes is much the same as those on the left who are trying to pin the blame on last year's corporate tax cuts.
Brian Riedl has a plan to stabilize the national debt at 95 percent of GDP. He says trying it might be political suicide, but the alternative is much worse.
The federal government spent $790 billion more than it taxed during fiscal year 2018. The deficit is about to get worse. Much worse.
Calls to shrink the size, scope, and spending of government, or even balance its budget, have gone the way of the dodo bird. That's kind of a problem.
The economy might be humming but when are we going to have to, you know, pay for the party already?
The federal government has run up a deficit of $684 billion this year. The CBO predicts that number will exceed $1 trillion in 2019.
One of the most lasting consequences of the Trump years will be Republicans' complete abdication of fiscal responsibility.
New CBO analysis shows debt could exceed 200 percent (!!!) of GDP by mid-century without changes.
Of course, June's deficit represents just a small fraction of our overall national debt.
Larry Kudlow says President Trump's agenda has been reducing federal budget deficits, but CBO estimates say otherwise.
Thursday's vote is an empty gesture. Worse, it's a hypocritical one.
The Congressional Budget Office is about to release a report. Spoiler alert: It won't be pretty.
Thanks to Congress and President Trump, budget deficits will only mushroom.
The new two-year budget deal will result in a $1 trillion deficit.
Celebrities and sitting legislators prefer physical violence to fiscal restraint.
The GOP leadership cheers on a bipartisan spending spree.
If a Republican president can't address a Republican-controlled Congress without paying lip service to the idea of cutting spending, what good are Republicans?
The House-passed continuing resolution died Friday in the Senate, but any deal to keep the government operating will likely do similar damage to the deficit.
Despite big promises, it fails in its primary mission: paying for the actual cost of government
After all that fuss from 2009 onward, Rand Paul is the last Republican left objecting to the continued growth of government.
The problem that has long plagued reformers in the two controlling parties is the failure to put a stop to spending.
Ready for another round of tax cuts combined with spending increases?
Nick Gillespie, Katherine Mangu-Ward, and Matt Welch talk deficits, Chuck Berry, Gorsuch, and the Bezos bot.
Is anybody actually interested in balancing the federal budget?
The Kentucky Republican on Bolton, Tillerson, and the fantasy that America can topple governments and replace them with something better.
Deficits aren't in the trillion dollar range anymore so that's supposed to be good.
Trump says he can get $300 billion in cuts from $78 billion in spending. Er, what?
Thanks to more spending, annual deficits will grow faster than expected.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10