My USA Today Op Ed on Using Emergency Powers to Build Trump's Wall
The op ed explains why this option is not legal - and why it would set a dangerous precedent if the president succeeded in doing it.
The op ed explains why this option is not legal - and why it would set a dangerous precedent if the president succeeded in doing it.
The op ed describes the extensive harm likely to be caused by condemning the large amounts of private property that would need to be seized to build the wall.
But Democrats shouldn't simply walk away.
Some members of Congress still care about private property.
The supposed border "crisis" is already solving itself.
Rebutting Krugman, cracking on Graham, and searching in vain for "freedom" in a caucus.
Trump's shutdown is a temporary, political fight that won't save any money or reduce the size of government.
They correctly warn it would set a dangerous precedent that could be abused by future presidents, including liberal Democrats.
You know, for a caucus called "freedom"...
Congressional Democrats want to put more cameras and sensors on private property.
Tragedy alone is not justification enough for drastic measures.
Republicans embrace presidential authoritarianism, continuing a foul bipartisan tradition of legislating immigration through the executive branch.
The bill would likely stop Trump from using the "military version of eminent domain."
Five years ago, McConnell declared the need to restore the Senate. Instead, he's broken it further.
The op ed was published yesterday in the New York Daily News, but may be even more relevant today.
Give up your wall, Mr. President.
The profit incentives created by prohibition doom any effort to block the drug "pipeline."
Note: Undocumented immigrants are not wild animals.
The two Democratic leaders' comments suggest neither side is going to compromise on wall funding anytime soon.
The president's Oval Office address was misleading.
An immigration primer about the figures that matter. And the ones that Trump makes up.
The president and his administration have a long track record of basing policy on dystopian falsehoods about terrorists and criminals streaming north.
Plus: Israel boycott bill divides Democrats, Cyntoia Brown gets clemency, and the "skills gap" was a lie.
Can Trump really exploit emergency powers to use eminent domain to build his wall without additional congressional authorization? If he succeeds, conservatives are likely to regret the precedent he sets.
What conservatives against "market fundamentalism" can tell you about libertarians without power
He probably won't shut down the internet. But declaring a "national emergency" is a bad idea anyway.
Plus: The TSA mask is slipping and government shutdown goes on.
The President's recent threat to use "the military version of eminent domain" to seize property for his border wall is just the tip of a larger iceberg of policies and legal positions inimical to constitutional property rights.
Whatever it is, it can't be good.
The world will keep spinning, no matter how long the government shutdown lasts.
You should call for a guest worker program to solve the problem of unauthorized immigration.
Plus: Democrats divided on deficit-neutral spending and an autopsy of The Weekly Standard.
It all comes down to one man.
Denying Trump a symbolic victory isn't a good reason to play with the lives of Dreamers.
Democrats should negotiate a partial wall for Dreamer deal
No, but it's nice to fantasize.
Yes, it's only temporary. But if it stops Trump from blowing money on a stupid border wall, cheer it on.
No but really, the shutdown is probably going to happen.
The campaign isn't actually about ladders.
The president needs to experience a political shellacking before he'll back off.
It's a bad idea in more ways than one.
And then watch your poll numbers tank
It sounds like Trump is folding, which is probably for the best.
The best we can hope for is that Trump gives in.
Drama over a possible government shutdown came to a head today. But Amash is sure of "one thing": The eventual deal won't be good for the country.
The FIRST STEP Act might get shoved into an end-of-year spending bill.