The Age-Gated Internet Is Here
Goodbye, online anonymity.
The NO FAKES Act imposes censorship, threatens anonymity, and regulates innovation.
"The subpoena is ... a classic ‘fishing expedition’ in constitutionally protected waters.”
The state legislature passed a law to limit anonymous reports to its child abuse hotline.
The age verification proposal is a disaster for both children and adults.
A law to protect people engaged in journalism from having to reveal sources gets blocked by Sen. Tom Cotton.
Too many Western governments want to follow in the footsteps of authoritarians when it comes to tech privacy.
And, even more exciting, there’s personal jurisdiction thrown in.
“[I]t undermines and stifles First Amendment privileges,” says a federal court, defining “cancel culture” as “the phenomenon of aggressively targeting individuals or groups, whose views aggressors deem unacceptable, in an effort to destroy them personally and/or professionally.”
A Scottish man was just convicted for tweeting an insult about a dead person. The authorities already have too much power to censor.
Attempts by British lawmakers to erase online anonymity would lead to radical speech being pushed underground.
"[M]ost revealing of actual knowledge of falsity is the vehicle chosen by Riccio to spread the falsehoods—the anonymous letter."
Six justices agreed that the state's "dragnet for sensitive donor information" imposes "a widespread burden on donors' associational rights."
The plaintiff is Francesca Viola, who wrote the comment when she was a journalism professor at Temple University.
A California rule and a bill approved by the House seem designed to chill freedom of speech and freedom of association.
A broad coalition of groups is asking the Supreme Court to overturn the state's policy.
May plaintiffs alleged sexual assault proceed pseudonymously, when the defendant is being publicly named?
When can libel plaintiffs, suing over allegedly false claims of sexual misconduct, sue pseudonymously? When can defendants defend pseudonymously?
Unsurprisingly, the exact allegations that are said to be libelous don't appear in the complaint.
So holds a district court, in a copyright case brought by the Jehovah's Witnesses against a Reddit commenter.
Tor, a leading service for anonymously accessing the Internet, is shielded by 47 U.S.C. § 230.
Trump thinks that by publishing the piece, the Times is "virtually" guilty of "treason."
A little consistency would be nice.
Cybercurrencies are not as anonymous as you might think.
A handful of best practices can go a long way toward shielding your transactions from government spies and other malevolents.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks