Unconstitutional State Food, Agriculture Crackdowns Spur Congress to Act
States like Massachusetts attempt to control how farms outside their borders operate.
States like Massachusetts attempt to control how farms outside their borders operate.
Libertarian legal ideas are gaining ground.
The possible replacements include Texas Supreme Court Justice Don Willett.
Exemption for former police and other types of government officials in Gun-Free School Zone Act violates equal protection of the law for other licensed gun carriers, suit argues.
What the Senate Judiciary Committee should ask the Supreme Court candidate.
Revisiting a landmark First Amendment case.
The Trump administration has two openings to fill on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit.
An issue the Supreme Court candidate should address.
"This case illustrates the great deference that federal courts must show to government regulations," claims judge.
A decision in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin is expected soon.
The battle over state power, unwritten rights, and the 14th Amendment
The late Supreme Court justice's mixed legacy on liberty and the Constitution
The Supreme Court hears arguments in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
Examining the role of dissenting opinions in U.S. legal history.
And just plain mean-spiritedly stupid and wrong, too.
Why Donald Trump is wrong about the text and history of the 14th Amendment.
The defiant clerk's defenders dangerously blur the distinction between private action and state action.
Libertarians are changing the face of legal conservatism.
Liberal hysterics in defense of occupational licensing and property seizures.
Protecting economic liberty from state infringement.
Was Lochner v. New York a "lawless" decision?
Does the Privileges or Immunities Clause protect unenumerated rights?
A further reply to conservative law professor Kurt Lash
A reply to conservative law professor Kurt Lash.
Conservatives and progressives share a common criticism of Justice Kennedy's gay marriage opinion.
The state should not be involved in marriage. But libertarians who think that this is all that need be said are wrong.
The same individualistic jurisprudence that advances gay rights could also imperil "progressive" economic reforms.
The Cornell Law Review says libertarians are reshaping the conservative legal movement.
A writer at Slate makes a left-wing case for judicial abstinence.
The situation is common for projects even tangentially connected to sex work or adult entertainment. Guess who's to blame?
If our rights come from the government, not within, then they are not rights, but permission slips.
Deference to elected majorities was a Progressive ideal long before modern conservatives picked up the baton.
The Equal Protection Clause demands equal treatment for same-sex couples.
Institute for Justice lawyer Clark Neily on judicial activism, fundamental rights, and suing the government.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10