Today at SCOTUS: Affirmative Action on Trial
The Supreme Court hears arguments in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
The Supreme Court hears arguments in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
Examining the role of dissenting opinions in U.S. legal history.
And just plain mean-spiritedly stupid and wrong, too.
Why Donald Trump is wrong about the text and history of the 14th Amendment.
The defiant clerk's defenders dangerously blur the distinction between private action and state action.
Libertarians are changing the face of legal conservatism.
Liberal hysterics in defense of occupational licensing and property seizures.
Protecting economic liberty from state infringement.
Was Lochner v. New York a "lawless" decision?
Does the Privileges or Immunities Clause protect unenumerated rights?
A further reply to conservative law professor Kurt Lash
A reply to conservative law professor Kurt Lash.
Conservatives and progressives share a common criticism of Justice Kennedy's gay marriage opinion.
The state should not be involved in marriage. But libertarians who think that this is all that need be said are wrong.
The same individualistic jurisprudence that advances gay rights could also imperil "progressive" economic reforms.
The Cornell Law Review says libertarians are reshaping the conservative legal movement.
A writer at Slate makes a left-wing case for judicial abstinence.
The situation is common for projects even tangentially connected to sex work or adult entertainment. Guess who's to blame?
If our rights come from the government, not within, then they are not rights, but permission slips.
Deference to elected majorities was a Progressive ideal long before modern conservatives picked up the baton.
The Equal Protection Clause demands equal treatment for same-sex couples.
Institute for Justice lawyer Clark Neily on judicial activism, fundamental rights, and suing the government.
State officials may not like it, but they're still bound by the First Amendment.
A reply to Richard Epstein's take on the right to keep and bear arms
Correcting the cartoonish vilification of a libertarian Supreme Court decision
Can "progressive originalism" become the Next Big Thing on the legal left?