What Does the Boston Bombing Say About Diversity?
Individuals should be judged, not groups.
Individuals should be judged, not groups.
Making life slightly better for travelers may not be enough to overcome the bureaucratic imperative: When in doubt, do nothing.
We must be vigilant against the predictable efforts of politicians to exploit the Boston bombings to aggrandize their power.
A new FDA report could mean more of your favorite cheeses will be unavailable in the United States.
Bill extending Fourth Amendment to all electronic documents goes to the Senate for a vote.
Matthew McConaughey scores again, Ricky Jay defies belief.
A new company challenges government controls over the broadcast spectrum.
If the Bloomberg administration believes that salt is worth losing your freedom over, imagine what he'd have planned after a terrorist attack.
As we grow more secure, our tolerance for any remaining risk, or even any potential risk, gets smaller.
When government changes the law to suit the demands of the people when they are weeping, it fundamentally undermines our freedoms.
Working around the public education system can sometimes have terrible consequences.
Police can ask about ticking bombs without sacrificing the Fifth Amendment.
And one reason why it should.
Terrorist tactics should not scare us into undermining the Constitution.
There is no practical, objective way for an outside observer to define another individual's best interest.
While Boston residents celebrate the capture of suspected marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, civil libertarians question police tactics.
Legislators in Pennsylvania and Tennessee may do the unthinkable during their respective 2013-2014 sessions.
The Supreme Court weighs a contentious dispute over adoption, Indian lineage, and child welfare.
Few Americans realize what cruelties have been inflicted in their name.
From Minnesota to New Mexico, overreaching regulators are violating property rights.
The new digital comic paints wild picture of life after a privacy apocalypse.
Feminists should celebrate the iconic British leader.
Does allowing companies to patent human genes mean more medical progress, or less?
America's cops need more oversight, not more leeway to evade the law.
Tom Cruise copes with a post-apocalyptic future, new indie offers a baffling present.
Whether Democrats like it or not, this issue concerns the Constitution.
The Constitution doesn't permit the feds to steal your money. But steal, the feds do.
States can block many of the law's worst provisions and most troubling consequences.
It's time to downsize or, better yet, privatize.
Would a broader screening requirement for gun buyers reduce violent crime?
When it comes to insuring compliance with government regulations, business is booming.
Boston residents wonder if Patriots' Day will ever be the same again.
...and from every other time a terrible story is developing.
How immigrants expand the economy and benefit all Americans.
There's no guarantee new regulations will prevent another tragedy.
The battle between smugglers and the state forged the U.S.
Popular new movie fails to resuscitate the sports pioneer's important 1964 book on civil rights and baseball.
The U.S. government has been tireless in pursuing a policy that does not look better with time
Trade and cooperation are superior to force and command.
Bioshock Infinite makes a strong case that video games can be great pop art.
In what may show the coalescence of a movement, academia finally appears to embrace the idea that people want more control over their food choices.
A review of The Infinite Resource: The Power of Ideas.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.