Overestimating 'Inequality'
Paul Krugman is wrong.
It's easier to climb a ladder that's been cut-off by politicians.
Why does their rhetoric make us doubt their sincerity about seeking a diplomatic resolution?
Kate Winslet in a slushy romance, Penn and Teller on the trail of an artistic mystery.
Think of a TSA checkpoint that goes on, forever.
Any so-called "freedom feminism" that includes Phyllis Schlafly and the anti-choice wing of the conservative movement is not libertarian, says Sharon Presley.
For more than a decade, the federal government assumed it could consign thousands of Americans to travel purgatory without justifying itself to anyone. That may be changing.
Obama's observation that marijuana is safer than alcohol exposed a central myth underlying support for the war on drugs.
Every year in the State of the Union, the president brags about the same small ed reform victory-because there's nothing else to say.
When "humor and jokes" become a free speech issue.
Three Republican responses to the State of the Union Address.
Federalism avoids the need for a national consensus on marijuana.
It'll set a bad precedent while preventing a deep restructuring
A new proposal from three GOP Senators tackles access and affordability.
As President Gerald Ford once said, "the state of the union is not good"
Economic liberty shouldn't simply assume a pro-business stance, or discuss only the privileges government extends to unions.
As is so often the case, popular and consumer culture are ahead of our political culture.
The court decision is disastrous, but not because it struck down the net neutrality rules.
These panels are the equivalent of the participation awards handed out to every kid in little league.
There's no reality behind the idea that some Lost Tribe of Gypsy Harlots wanders about the world from mega-event to mega-event, unimpeded by the usual logistics of transport and lodging.
One cannot critique the surveillance state without critiquing the rest of the existing political apparatus.
He knows it's wrong, so why won't he do something to change federal policy?
Not if their grand plans require grand corporate welfare
If anything, we're trending toward libertarianism.
Obama's NSA reforms flunk civil libertarian tests.
The Kelly Thomas case makes it hard to be optimistic about police.
A maker of the gun ad the NFL didn't want in the Super Bowl wants Americans to understand they might need guns to fight tyranny.
His most recent speech was a thinly disguised effort to change the subject.
He and two likeminded justices saw no room for muzzling speech.
In sizing up Obama's "reforms" of the indiscriminate gathering of data on every American, remember this: Politicians will do everything they can get away with in pursuit of their own agenda.
We can love nature and still hate the tyranny of bureaucrats' rules.
Why it's hard to believe the president is serious about surveillance reform
Preet Bharara's wage crusade will hurt foreign housekeepers.
From a critic of the Patriot Act to its defender, it's been quite a transformation.
Which one offers more hope and change right now, West Coast tech start-up culture or Washington political culture? The question answers itself.
Opponents of school choice sincerely believe that if you make everybody stay on the Titanic, then maybe it won't sink as fast.
Never have so many Americans been brought under surveillance for such a meager payoff.
The erroneous belief that only rights violations may be condemned leads too easily to the corollary error that if some conduct is wrong, it must somehow be a rights violation.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.