Nikki Haley's Crazy Plan to Require Verification on Social Media
The 2024 GOP candidate has proposed something blatantly unconstitutional.
The 2024 GOP candidate has proposed something blatantly unconstitutional.
"Being a true free speech champion does require that you defend speech that even you disagree with," says libertarian Rikki Schlott.
The Supreme Court considers whether and when banishing irksome constituents violates the First Amendment.
The propensity of prosecutors to jump to conclusions before all the evidence is in is very destructive—and nothing new.
“We've taught young people that any of their missteps or any of their heterodox opinions are grounds to tear them down. That's no way to grow up.”
“We've taught young people that any of their missteps or any of their heterodox opinions are grounds to tear them down. That's no way to grow up.”
Democrats and Republicans are united in thinking their political agendas trump the First Amendment.
Popular podcasts and shows portray crime as salacious and sexy, failing ordinary victims in the process.
The justices agreed to consider whether the Biden administration's efforts to suppress online "misinformation" were unconstitutional.
Perhaps the Walter Cronkite Awards ought to have slightly higher standards?
Even content creators outside of New York would feel its effects.
Social media overuse among teens may be a symptom, not the cause, of their distress.
We should all be skeptical that the same government that can't balance a budget can revamp the dominant form of modern communications and boost young people's self-esteem.
If Facebook et al. are pushing a "radical leftist narrative," why don’t they have a constitutional right to do that?
A series of studies suggest it's not algorithms that are driving political polarization, ignorance, or toxicity online.
The laws require major social media platforms to host content they disapprove of for substantive reasons.
The late California senator always seemed to err on the side of more government power and less individual freedom.
The Republican presidential candidate ignores the lethal impact of the drug policies he avidly supports.
Popular podcasts and shows portray crime as salacious and sexy, failing ordinary victims in the process.
Yoel Roth worries about government meddling in content moderation, except when Democrats target "misinformation."
This sets a dangerous precedent.
The appeals court narrowed a preliminary injunction against such meddling but confirmed the threat that it poses to freedom of speech.
A surveillance authority in the country’s troubling Online Safety Bill won’t be enforced, officials say. But for how long?
The Colorado governor finds common ground with many libertarians. But does he really stand for more freedom?
Plus: A listener question concerning porn verification laws.
Plus: The doubling of the deficit, young Americans souring on college, and more...
Plus: Meta revises controversial "dangerous organizations" policy, a win against civil asset forfeiture in Detroit, and more...
There are already people responsible for regulating children’s online activity: parents and guardians.
People should be free to choose how cautious to be. Mask mandates, lockdowns, and closing schools won't stop the virus.
A federal judge compared Waylon Bailey’s Facebook jest to "falsely shouting fire in a theatre."
The appeals court ruled that a Facebook post alluding to World War Z was clearly protected by the First Amendment.
The paper worries that "social media companies are receding from their role as watchdogs against political misinformation."
The video site took out ads touting social media's benefits.
Plus: Americans vote too much, Indiana abortion ban to take effect, and more...
Plaintiffs in Missouri v. Biden allege that federal pressure to remove and suppress COVID-19 material on Facebook and Twitter violates the First Amendment.
A new study of COVID-19 narratives makes the very mistake it purports to correct.
Join Reason on YouTube and Facebook on Thursday at 1:30 p.m. Eastern for a live discussion with Jay Bhattacharya and John Vecchione about their legal case against the Biden administration.
If you don't take Oliver Anthony's surprise hit song too seriously, it's a lot of fun. Regrettably, a lot of people are taking the song much too seriously indeed.
Plus: A listener inquires about the potential positive effects of ranked-choice voting reforms.
Humanity has always adjusted to the reliability of new information sources.
Plus: A warning about trigger warnings, Biden blocks uranium mining near Grand Canyon, and more...
The Kids Online Safety Act imposes an amorphous "duty of care" that would compromise anonymous speech and restrict access to constitutionally protected content.
Unwired makes an unconvincing argument for heavy-handed tech regulation.
A new documentary film argues that the second-largest website on the planet is flooded with misinformation. Is that right?
Join Reason on YouTube and Facebook at 1 p.m. Eastern this Thursday for a discussion with director Alex Winter about his new documentary The YouTube Effect.
New research on Facebook before the 2020 election finds scant evidence to suggest algorithms are shifting our political views.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10