Why the Media Covered for Biden
Plus: A listener asks whether Bruce Springsteen's song Born in the U.S.A is actually patriotic.
Plus: A listener asks whether Bruce Springsteen's song Born in the U.S.A is actually patriotic.
Even as he praises judicial decisions that made room for "dissenters" and protected "robust political debate," Tim Wu pushes sweeping rationales for censorship.
The majority opinion makes clear that social media content moderation is an activity protected by the First Amendment. That likely dooms large parts of the state laws restricting content moderation.
The Court is remanding these two cases for more analysis—but it made its views on some key issues clear.
China's free speech record is bad, but the federal government's isn't so great either.
The standing requirements laid down by the majority might make it extremely difficult or impossible for victims of indirect goverment censorship to get their cases to court.
The verdict in Murthy v. Missouri is a big, flashing green light that jawboning may resume.
Murthy v. Missouri challenges government efforts to suppress dissenting viewpoints on social media.
"It’s not like public health is infallible," the Stanford professor and Great Barrington Declaration author tells Reason's Nick Gillespie.
A covert U.S. military social media campaign was an exercise in profound hypocrisy.
X's child porn detection system doesn’t violate an Illinois biometric privacy law, the judge ruled.
We need parents with better phone habits, not more government regulation of social media.
Plus: Ex-NSA chief joins forces with OpenAI, conscription squads hunt Ukrainian draft-dodgers, and more...
Case in point: The Washington Post's Philip Bump.
The plaintiffs hope to "help Republicans and conservatives see why this ban is inconsistent with the free speech values they say they care about."
Officials suspend efforts to force X to suppress the world’s access to video of a crime.
The feds charged Alex Choi with “causing the placement of explosive or incendiary device on an aircraft” after he shot fireworks out of a helicopter into an empty desert.
Corey Harris attracted widespread news coverage—including from Reason—when a video showed him behind the wheel during a court hearing about a suspended license. Except he never had a license at all.
Corey Harris' case should never have been a national news story to begin with.
From tattoos to abortions to gender expression, a confusing mess of laws govern which Americans are considered adults.
New bipartisan legislation would sunset Section 230 after next year.
The intelligence community is admitting that info from data brokers is sensitive but isn’t accepting hard limits on how to use it.
Unless the Supreme Court rules against this practice, it is certain to continue.
Congress is "silencing the 170 million Americans who use the platform to communicate," the company argues.
Instead of lobbying for age verification and youth social media bans, parents can simply restrict their kids' smartphone use.
Calls from the left and right to mimic European speech laws bring the U.S. to a crossroads between robust First Amendment protections and rising regulation.
Instead of trusting parents to manage their families, lawmakers from both parties prefer to empower the Nanny State.
Local hostility to free speech may become a global problem.
The American Sunlight Project contends that researchers are being silenced by their critics.
The News2Share cofounder is revolutionizing news coverage.
Plus: Masking protesters, how Google Search got so bad, Columbia's anti-apartheid protests of the '80s, and more...
Plus: A listener asks the editors to steel man the case for the Jones Act, an antiquated law that regulates maritime commerce in U.S. waters.
Plus: Homework liberation in Poland, Orthodox rabbi tells students to flee Columbia, toddler anarchy, and more...
Banning companies for doing business with China is a bad path to start down.
Ethan Blevins of the Pacific Legal Foundation explains why. I myself have made similar arguments.
"I am not in the newsroom," the embattled NPR chieftain said over and over again.
The author of The Anxious Generation argues that parents, schools, and society must keep kids off of social media.
An interview with Consumer Choice Center Deputy Director Yaël Ossowski.
The push to regulate social media content infringes on rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment.
Fight back through better information and discourse, not by empowering the government.
If adopted by the Supreme Court, Prof. Candeub's approach would be a grave menace to freedom of speech.
Teens who use social media heavily also spend the most in-person time with friends.
From struggle sessions to cancel culture, the story depicts the terrors of surveillance authoritarianism.
Only 22 of the 476 studies in The Anxious Generation contain data on either heavy social media use or serious mental issues among adolescents, and none have data on both.
(You don't really have to shut up, but here's my money.)
Yes, I'll donate to Reason right now! I'll keep my money today, thanksReason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksHelp Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksReason is the antidote to the same old stale take on ideas that actually matter to me.
I’ll support Free Minds and Free Markets! Not interestedReason pushes me to think critically with facts and analysis that shape my perspective and amplify the ideas I care about.
I want to make a donation so that my voice can be heard! Not todayEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedIt’s hard to trust the media these days, especially when everyone is pushing a partisan agenda. Reason stands for my right to make my own choices.
Yes, I want to make a difference for Free Minds and Free Markets! No, I’ll follow the partisan herdReason’s fearless, principled journalism keeps me sane in a crazy world.
Making a donation to Reason right now will keep me from losing my mind! No, I like being madSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksSupport the voices that advocate for your freedom. Donate to Reason today!
Yes, I want to make a difference for Free Minds and Free Markets! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today