The First Amendment Protects Everyone, Even Facebook and Twitter
Florida passed a law to stop big tech “censorship.” But the law itself tramples First Amendment rights.
Florida passed a law to stop big tech “censorship.” But the law itself tramples First Amendment rights.
Sen. Amy Klobuchar wants to put HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, the former California attorney general with a reputation for being a partisan hack, in charge of "health disinformation" online.
The latest bill to “fight big tech” could turn your online experience into a miserable slog.
TikTok's "devious licks" trend has earned the company and its teen users plenty of scorn. But what's actually going on?
Facebook's rebrand signals that the widely scrutinized company retains lofty ambitions.
A business model where outrage is exploited for clicks describes both social media and the news media.
The First Amendment shields Americans from censorship, but authoritarian legislation in Britain and Canada warns of what could be in store if that protection fails.
The mainstream media's fear of Mark Zuckerberg is not supported by the documents.
When "protecting users' safety" actually means the opposite
"The plaintiffs failed to make out a plausible claim that the Pulse massacre was an act of 'international terrorism' as that term is defined in the ATA."
Plus: America's crackdown on Big Tech gives cover to Russia's crackdown on Big Tech, high inflation likely to continue into next year, and more...
Attempts by British lawmakers to erase online anonymity would lead to radical speech being pushed underground.
Upstart competitors can’t hope to match the resources required to compile a list of banned individuals and organizations.
Tech giants expressing openness to amending Section 230 are doing so out of naked self-interest, not the goodness of their hearts.
"A key part of the control in Cuba is keeping people afraid, keeping them isolated from one another," says Henken. The internet has mitigated this.
Patiently waiting for senators and whistleblowers to freak out over this
Plus: California can't limit private prisons, Yellen dismisses bank privacy concerns, and more...
"Maybe one billionaire with a penchant for destroying democracies shouldn’t be allowed to own so much of the internet," says the representative from New York.
The site is clearly in trouble and the government doesn't need to step in.
"We don't actually do finsta," Antigone Davis, Facebook's head of security, explained.
Young people who came of age after 9/11 aren't snowflakes despite being exposed to a series of catastrophic events and apocalyptic news narratives.
This is where government demands to moderate what users say will ultimately lead.
Political polarization drives social media use, rather than the other way around.
Politicians and activists claim social media is turning us into zombies. But new technologies have been greeted with skepticism since the dawn of time.
Government restrictions on private editorial discretion violate the First Amendment.
Robby Soave doesn't like it when social media deplatforms users, but the far bigger threat comes from lawmakers on a mission.
"It was a mistake among the digital team," says executive director Anthony Romero.
Emma Sarley's employer might come to regret instantly firing her.
No, law enforcement and school officials cannot order students to remove posts about exposure to the coronavirus.
Still, Facebook should not have allowed its VIPs to flout the rules it claimed applied to everyone.
Plus: "The endless catastrophe of Rikers Island," studies link luxury rentals and affordable housing, and more...
Maryland satire paper threatened over "OlneyFans" article, big tech companies "on the butcher's table," and more...
Here’s why Section 230 is so important.
Being jerks is just the way some people try to make themselves feel dominant.
The defendants are not on trial for child sex trafficking, yet prosecutor Reggie Jones wouldn't stop talking about it.
Hint: It wasn't Big Tech censorship.
Denizens of the popular online forum protested the spread of COVID misinformation, but the company rightly wouldn't cave to their demands. It still cracked down on 55 subreddits in the end.
Plus: More bad news for free speech online, Fauci on booster shots, and more...
A federal judge says an anti-porn group's suit against Twitter can move forward, in a case that could portend a dangerous expansion of how courts define "sex trafficking."
"The pandemic's wrongest man" can likely profit from martyrdom.
A new analysis reportedly showing a huge proportion of TikTok content is racist tells us nothing about the overall prevalence of extremist and bigoted content on the app.
Their study found that Twitter's efforts to police Donald Trump's false election fraud claims were ineffective and may even have backfired.
Breaking encryption technologies always makes us less safe, no matter what the justification.
The Pew Research Center found that support for censorship is increasing.
Plus: FTC revives antitrust suit against Facebook, Planned Parenthood pushes back against Montana abortion laws, and more...
Friday A/V Club: Some people are against concentrated media power. Some just want to bend it to their will.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10