Could Trump Impose More Tariffs Without Congressional Approval?
Yes. But there might be one more key opportunity to rein in presidential powers over trade.
Yes. But there might be one more key opportunity to rein in presidential powers over trade.
Plus: Kamala's Florida possibility, Columbia's Hamas sympathizers, and more...
At its core, the oft-denigrated decision revolved around whether the government can censor information leading up to an election.
"Right now, we need to get ourselves at least to a balanced budget, and that involves cutting a lot of the third rails of American politics," the Libertarian presidential nominee tells Reason.
Journalists should be interested in interrogating this contradiction, should the 2024 presidential candidate continue giving interviews.
Patrick Ruffini and Ruy Teixiera talk about how the U.S. electorate has changed in the last four years.
Plus: FEMA conspiracy theories, journalists killed in Gaza, and more...
The candidate’s protectionism offsets some otherwise positive tax ideas.
Both presidential candidates (and their running mates) seem confused about the constraints imposed by the First Amendment.
Harris is running away from her far-left past.
Post your recommendations in the comments; other weeks, there'll be other posts for other topics and other formats.
Harris rightly calls out regulations for causing the housing shortage, but she also supports rent control policies that will make it worse.
And it would wreck the economy.
Plus: Adams administration corruption, Fauci in hindsight, Taiwan's nuclear mistake, and more...
Teams that register before November 4, 2024 will be invited to participate in a virtual mentoring session.
Predict all of the biggest cases at the Supreme Court.
One year ago, political figures spread a false terrorism panic that made everyone less free—and incited violence against a child.
That just isn't happening in the United States, no matter what Donald Trump keeps claiming.
Plus: Longshoremen are ending their strike, the E.U. will impose huge new tariffs, and more...
A bitter election calls for a cocktail—and a lesson in the lunacy of price controls.
Many citizens of the land of the free are hooked on government checks.
I will be on a panel with Prof. Neil Siegel (Duke) and Prof. Derek Muller (Notre Dame) in a webinar sponsored by the Loyola University Chicago School of Law.
A federal judge ruled that the law was overbroad and violated the First Amendment.
Documentarian Ford Fischer discusses his experience covering the "Stop the Steal" movement, January 6, and what it all means for the future of journalism and democracy.
The would-be vice president is wrong to say that misinformation lacks First Amendment protection.
Plus: Starlink saves lives, prescient Norm MacDonald, and more...
Courts must be cautious in death penalty and other criminal cases when presented with a prosecutor's confession of "error"—such the Oklahoma A.G.'s dubious confession in this case.
Trump's protectionist running mate comes out against “cheap, knockoff toasters” and common sense.
While congressmen hold performative hearings to win political points, they delegate policymaking to the administrative.
Each party's candidate is jockeying to be more aggressive on fentanyl, whose use has proliferated as a direct result of government aggression.
Tim Walz is wrong to insist that it would "keep our dignity about how we treat other people."
The broad ban on AI-generated political content is clearly an affront to the First Amendment.
Vance says higher energy prices make building houses more costly. What, then, do tariffs on steel and lumber do?
Plus: J.D. Vance won last night's debate, longshoremen update, and more...
Glossip and Oklahoma have no response to the fact that that Glossip's defense team knew all about the allegedly "withheld" Brady information.
New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change. Out now for subscribers.