The Progressive Case for Cost-Benefit Analysis (But Not As Conducted in the Trump Administration)
My review of Reviving Rationality:Saving Cost-Benefit Analysis for the Sake of the Environment and Our Health by Michael Livermore and Richard Revesz.
My review of Reviving Rationality:Saving Cost-Benefit Analysis for the Sake of the Environment and Our Health by Michael Livermore and Richard Revesz.
"We've crafted the legislation necessary to avert climate catastrophe. It's time for you to pass it," proclaim staffers in a letter to Congressional leaders.
A ballot access law meant to block Communists has become an obstacle to third-party politics.
The Supreme Court is skeptical of agency efforts to pour new wine out of old bottles.
An interesting concurrence by Fifth Circuit Judge James Ho.
It would signal that the transportation future involves decentralization and rapid change rather than Washington-style command-and-control.
A 1942 decision about the Commerce Clause takes on new importance post-Roe.
Plus: When "anti-wokeness" becomes an obsession, why immigrants are upwardly mobile, and more...
The "waiver" opens the door for Bannon to testify before the congressional January 6 Committee. But former presidents are not entitled to executive privilege, and especially not when it comes to testimony by private citizens.
The Supreme Court proclaimed this term that the Lemon test had been abandoned. Is this what is in story for Chevron?
Dedication to free speech is in short supply around the world, with Britain and Canada previously considering similar bills.
The abortion wars have entered a new phase.
Something is wrong at the Food & Drug Administration's Center for Tobacco Products, and federal courts are beginning to notice.
Associate Editor Liz Wolfe discusses the political and economic fortunes of both Austin and Miami, plus potential reasons these pastures might not always be greener.
Here's hoping we don't wind up with more of the spending and favoritism that's become so common.
I coauthored the report with Clark Neily and Walter Olson, both of the Cato Institute.
Like it or not, the Thomas Court is here.
The Court agrees with my argument that crime victims can become "limited-purpose parties" in criminal proceedings to protect their interests, such as an interest in the confidentiality of mental health counseling records.
Plus: Don't cry for the failure of Homeland Security's disinformation board, states discover supply-side solutions to labor shortages, and more...
The project includes reports by conservative, libertarian, and progressive teams. I am coauthor of the Team Libertarian report.
John Adams called jury trials part of the "heart and lungs of liberty." Today, defendants are often punished for exercising that very right.
The ruling likely allows end of a cruel policy - but also reinforces broad presidential control over immigration.
A second public health official cited the work of antiracist educator Tema Okun after several people on the thread objected.
What should courts do when an agency action is based upon scientific evidence within the agency's expertise, but also implicates heightened scrutiny?
In her forceful West Virginia v. EPA dissent, Justice Kagan challenges the majority's commitment to textualism.
Democrats aren't really this short-sighted, are they?
A pro-life group's model legislation hints at how extreme enforcing abortion bans could get.
Chief Justice Roberts final opinion of the term rejects the statutory challenge to the Biden Administration's rescission of the "Remain in Mexico" policy.
Chief Justice Roberts writes for a six-justice majority in West Virginia v. EPA.
Such victims are often told they have no right to sue.
Justice Breyer consistently resisted conservative efforts to constrain federal power, so his opinion in Torres is a fitting swan song.
The Supreme Court announces when Judge Jackson will become Justice Jackson.
The former president's recklessness is beyond dispute, but that is not enough to convict him while respecting the First Amendment.
Understanding what Justice Alito got wrong in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
“My retirement from active service,” Breyer told the president, “will be effective on Thursday, June 30, 2022, at noon.”