N.Y. Court Opines on Use of AI by Experts
"[C]ounsel has an affirmative duty to disclose the use of artificial intelligence and the evidence sought to be admitted should properly be subject to a Frye hearing prior to its admission ...."
"[C]ounsel has an affirmative duty to disclose the use of artificial intelligence and the evidence sought to be admitted should properly be subject to a Frye hearing prior to its admission ...."
LLM AIs are too susceptible to manipulation—and too prone to inconsistency—to be viewed as reliable means of producing empirical evidence of ordinary meaning.
These policies may sound good on paper—but they would be disastrous in reality.
Plaintiff had argued that defendants' publicizing the religious court's statement "serves as a form of social pressure, calling on the community to shun or ostracize the individual until they comply with the court's demands."
Despite homelessness being on the rise, local governments keep cracking down on efforts to shelter those without permanent housing.
Plus: FEMA threat-related arrest, incentives for babymaking, "men" for Harris/Walz, and more...
Our draft article shows that corpus linguistics delivers where LLM AI tools fall short—in producing nuanced linguistic data instead of bare, artificial conclusions.
How U.S. presidents habitually use—and abuse—pronouns to deceive.
As we show in a draft article, corpus linguistic tools have been shown to do what LLM AIs cannot—produce transparent, replicable evidence of how a word or phrase is ordinarily used by the public.
Few problems can be resolved by grandstanding politicians threatening new penalties.
The plan is illegal. But courts might refuse to strike it down based on the "political questions" doctrine.
Can't Americans all just get along? Maybe we can't—and perhaps we shouldn't have to.
Americans are turning to home-cooked meals, but state regulators are making it harder for small food businesses to survive.
Mason Murphy says Officer Michael Schmitt violated his rights by punishing him for constitutionally protected speech.
It's fundamentally different from what Republicans have tried to do, but similar enough to be worrisome.
The court found scientific opinion about "shaken baby syndrome" has changed, and a man sentenced to 35 years in prison deserves a new trial.
A successful appointments clause challenge to Regional Fishery Management Councils. (Updated to fix block quotes)
Remembering the first time a partisan Senate minority blocked a judicial nomination that enjoyed majority support.
Donald Trump's plan for massive tariff increases is particularly dangerous because the White House could likely implement it without any new congressional authorization.
Max Boot's biography of Ronald Reagan is deeply researched and informative, but it sometimes stumbles when it tries to use the past to make sense of the present.
When they entered the White House, the budget deficit was a pandemic-influenced $2.3 trillion, and it was set to fall to $905 billion by 2024. It's now twice what it was supposed to be.
South Carolina bans all media interviews with incarcerated people, a policy the state's ACLU chapter says is the most restrictive in the country and infringes on its First Amendment rights.
"Right now, we need to get ourselves at least to a balanced budget, and that involves cutting a lot of the third rails of American politics," the Libertarian presidential nominee tells Reason.
Federal housing officials allege a New Hampshire landlord violated the Fair Housing Act for refusing to show a unit to two women with emotional support dogs.
The Supreme Court is considering whether a rule targeting "ghost guns" exceeds the agency's statutory authority.
Ryan Walters' strict stipulations make it clear he’s steering Oklahoma schools to purchase Donald Trump’s Bibles at a hefty cost.
Why is making spirits for personal use any of the government’s business in the first place?
A recent pair of panels looking at how nationwide injunctions impact federal regulatory programs.
That just isn't happening in the United States, no matter what Donald Trump keeps claiming.
Progressives are trying to fix the errors of the past, but they're ignoring the best solution: More robust property rights.
Many citizens of the land of the free are hooked on government checks.
No one knows how many federal crimes there are, the Supreme Court justice notes in Over Ruled.
Daniel Horwitz often represents people illegally silenced by the government. This time he says a court violated his First Amendment rights when it gagged him from publicly speaking about a troubled state prison.
"The judge soon learned that, in a recorded conversation between defense counsel and the defendant, the attorney had referred to the age, race, political affiliation, and gender of the court's judges, and suggested that the court 'should look a little bit more like the people that are in front of them.' The attorney also suggested that the defendant would not receive a fair trial from the court's judges, who are a different race and gender from the defendant. Finally, the attorney used a pejorative term, drawing on racial and gender stereotypes, to refer to the complainant."
A federal judge ruled that the law was overbroad and violated the First Amendment.
While congressmen hold performative hearings to win political points, they delegate policymaking to the administrative.
Tim Walz is wrong to insist that it would "keep our dignity about how we treat other people."
The broad ban on AI-generated political content is clearly an affront to the First Amendment.
The education chapter is written by Williamson Evers, and the corporate law chapter by Robert T. Miller.
A federal judge rejected the officers' claims of qualified immunity.
Conservatives blame Proposition 47 (2014) for higher rates of shoplifting in the state, but the real story is more complicated.