The Authoritarian Side of Effective Altruism Comes for AI
Proposed bills reveal the extreme measures E.A.’s AI doomsayers support.
Proposed bills reveal the extreme measures E.A.’s AI doomsayers support.
The U.S. has successfully navigated past debt challenges, notably in the 1990s. Policymakers can fix this if they find the will to do so.
The Supreme Court's flawed decision largely ignores text and original meaning, and fails to resolve crucial issues.
Supervised release shouldn't require former inmates to give up their First Amendment rights.
A federal appeals court ruled that the government is not immune from a breach-of-contract lawsuit filed by foreign students duped into enrolling into a fake school run by ICE.
The decision to overturn Chevron removes an agency trump card, but does not instruct courts to ignore agency opinions--and they won't.
The 5th Circuit ruled that the agency violated the Administrative Procedure Act when it rejected applications from manufacturers of flavored nicotine e-liquids.
There is no textual basis for "immunity" as such, but there are structural reasons why some degree of insulation is inevitable.
A thoughtful, sober take on Trump v. United States.
Those three presidential candidates are making promises that would have bewildered and horrified the Founding Fathers.
Contrary to progressive criticism, curtailing bureaucratic power is not about protecting "the wealthy and powerful."
The doctrine makes it nearly impossible for victims of prosecutorial misconduct to get recourse.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson says these cases will "devastate" the regulatory state. Good.
“Immigration is an area of the law where the partisan alignments break down over Chevron.”
And a grand jury says that's illegal.
"This is an obvious attempt to use our public schools to convert kids to Christianity. We live in a democracy, not a theocracy," one ACLU attorney tells Reason.
By requiring "absolute" immunity for some "official acts" and "presumptive" immunity for others, the justices cast doubt on the viability of Donald Trump's election interference prosecution.
Notre Dame law Prof. Patrick Reidy argues that religious organizations are entitled to faith-based exemptions from zoning restrictions preventing them from building affordable housing on their land.
China's free speech record is bad, but the federal government's isn't so great either.
Donald Trump had a point before his campaign walked it back.
Her concurrence is a reminder that the application of criminal law should not be infected by personal animus toward any given defendant.
The Supreme Court's recent rulings limiting the powers of the administrative state are a blessing for liberals who might not control the White House for much longer.
The decision also negates two counts of the federal indictment accusing Donald Trump of illegally interfering in the 2020 presidential election.
It won't end the administrative state or even significantly reduce the amount of federal regulation. But it's still a valuable step towards protecting the rule of law and curbing executive power.
The Court says Chevron deference allows bureaucrats to usurp a judicial function, creating "an eternal fog of uncertainty" about what the law allows or requires.
Biden's incoherence and Trump's comparatively cogent lies demonstrate just how poorly the two-party system serves supporters of small government.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor called the Supreme Court ruling in SEC v. Jarkesy "a power grab." She's right, but in the wrong way.
In a 5-4 decision, the male justices side with the state and industry challengers and the female justices side with the Environmental Protection Agency
Assange's plea deal sets a threatening precedent for free speech and journalism.
The decision rejects a system in which the agency imposes civil penalties after investigating people and validating its own allegations.
The decision reverses the Court's previous stay of a lower court decision blocking part of the law.
The state cut down private fruit trees and offered gift cards as compensation. It didn't solve the citrus canker problem.
The candidate who grasps the gravity of this situation and proposes concrete steps to address it will demonstrate the leadership our nation now desperately needs. The stakes couldn't be higher.
Even if one thinks the federal government crossed the line in pushing more aggressive social-media-platform content moderation policies, plaintiffs must still satisfy the traditional requirements of Article III standing.
The candidate makes the case against the two-party system.
Thanks to the lengthy approval process and special interests surrounding environmental review, it takes far longer to build anything in the United States than in other developed countries.
Although critics say the Court’s current approach is unworkable, it has been undeniably effective at defeating constitutionally dubious gun regulations.
Ending U.S. aid would give Washington less leverage in the Middle East. That's why it's worth doing.
There is a great deal of panic surrounding the "extreme" nature of the current Court. But that is often not based in reality.
The U.S. Conference of Mayors has endorsed "heartland visas," which would create a pathway for skilled immigrants to settle in stagnating communities.
The case hinged upon the idea of what a publicly funded school can teach. But parents do have a role to play in that conversation.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10