Global Military Expenditures Fall .5 Percent
First decline since 1988 fuelled by cuts in the West
First decline since 1988 fuelled by cuts in the West
The scariest tiny little cutbacks in the entire world
Thanks to budgeting battle, expect it to be extremely confusing
Doesn't want U.S. retreating from interventionism
Continuing Resolution gives them $10 billion in additional funds
Would make them harder for enemy to target
The U.S. record at nation-building isn't much better at home than abroad.
It's not the end of the world
It's never wise to rely on Uncle Sugar
Both sides are guilty of using fear in the sequestration debate.
And, of course, the Buffett Rule
Would be able to analyze face, eyes, voice and thumbpring
But aren't as keen on his policies relating to guns and the economy
Eases rules in order to allow production as part of troubled program
Would help predict future behavior
Says eliminating tax subsidies for oil companies would help
Maybe have to absorb $700 million as they go over budget on contract
In lawsuit, says he was trying to stop company from billing U.S. for work it didn't do
A realist foreign-policy vision that is neither imperialistic nor isolationist.
If the military can't absorb a $55 billion hit, it's not worth what we've been spending on it.
Don't know when they'll degrade or how long they remain a threat
Americans among the hostages held
Despite sequestration being ditched and no interest for cuts by the Washington establishment
Cheap missiles may come from Iran and China, increasing market for defenses
Spending put on hold pending fiscal cliff outcomes
The prospective defense secretary will be more influential by speaking out against war and empire.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10