McGinnis: The Empire Strikes Back Against Originalism
"All these criticisms [of originalism] are actually disputes about original meaning, not rejections of it."
"All these criticisms [of originalism] are actually disputes about original meaning, not rejections of it."
Courts of Appeals should resist the urge to opine on cases pending before the Supreme Court
Neither Terry Rolin or his daughter were ever charged with a crime, but that didn't stop the DEA from trying to seize more than $82,000 from them through civil asset forfeiture.
The former New York City mayor has never been good at concealing his conviction that he is smarter and better than the rest of us.
Defensive official reactions to corruption encourage the attitude that troubles the attorney general.
"I was, at the time, very scared."
District Attorney Jackie Lacey faces re-election today against a tough field calling for more criminal justice reforms.
I cast my first vote in a Democratic primary today
After Bethune-Hill, there were not four votes to review the House's petition
The zones cover vast swaths of Tennessee's cities—and turn minor drug crimes into sentences usually reserved for rape and murder.
Concern for the families appeared on both sides of the debate.
Man tackled, shot twice for crime of illegally shifting between train cars.
Audio from an Oral Argument scheduled in October will likely be used in political advertisements
Make your time in the air as familiar and predictable as possible
I put my Facebook account at risk (again) to find out
Psychologist Jesus Padilla was forbidden to complete research that could have set many indefinitely committed people free. He died with the work unfinished.
Rails-to-trails, unfair competition, and nonactionable puffery.
Irresponsible, ineffective, and dishonest
Plus: Who's using Clearview AI?, court rules against Joe Arpaio, and more...
James Phillips and I preview our new research in the Atlantic
Shifting the process from the Justice Department to the White House can help eliminate bureaucracy and meddling from prosecutors.
How far does the "speech integral to criminal conduct" exception go?
Lawmakers want to get tougher on touching "with the intent to sexually arouse."
Lynchings are already illegal. But the law would give prosecutors more power—including what amounts to an expansion of the federal death penalty.
If the Court is going to abolish the 20th century remedies, can we at least have the 19th century remedies back?
Government officials keep trying to make us expose our data to them—and the criminals who ride on their coattails.
The presidential candidate's explanation of his sudden reversal on the issue is utterly implausible.
The problems with federal sentencing guidelines are real and troubling, even in cases that do not involve the president’s pals.
One of the officers was fired after arresting two 6-year-olds in one day.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10