Hate Speech on Social Media
Facebook bans Farrakhan, Yiannopoulos, and others, and come watch me talk about hate speech on social media at NYU
Facebook bans Farrakhan, Yiannopoulos, and others, and come watch me talk about hate speech on social media at NYU
Short answer: no, not even close
Stanford may be about to seriously damage one of the world's leading academic publishers, for what seem like very small budgetary savings.
The Ninth Circuit orders briefing on whether one national injunction moots another
And yet despite the split, I doubt that the Supreme Court would agree to take the case.
"Domingo discussed with the [confidential informant] different targets for an attack, including Jews, police officers, churches, and a military facility."
A major environmental case might settle before the Supreme Court has the chance to review it.
Over 23 years ago Missouri’s criminal justice system failed a man charged with murder. This week he’s looking at his last best chance at freedom.
"The black tide of psychosis and the red tide of violence are rising together on a green wave."
New Jersey is detaining almost half as many people pretrial, and the state is not seeing a big crime wave.
Yujing Zhang, Cindy Yang, and prostitution busts at Chinese spas have planted the seeds for new conspiratorial corruption narratives to bloom.
It wasn't about what was fair, it wasn't about what was honest, it was about winning.
Come hear Judge Joan Larsen give inaugural Cooley Judicial Lecture at Georgetown Law; See Cooley Book Prize awarded to Richard Fallon
The Trump Administration has decided that the Affordable Care Act should be voided in its entirety.
Fifteen legal scholars weigh in, including the VC's own Keith Whittington, and myself.
The attorney general has released his summary of the report. Let the games begin.
Electron microscopy, therapeutic insoles, and (allegedly) thieving police.
Courts have been struggling with this issue for years, and now the law is even more divided than before.
There is growing support for packing the Supreme Court among liberal Democrats, including some presidential candidates. It's a terrible idea that would severely damage the institution of judicial review, if ever implemented. Thoughtful liberals would do well to reject it.
I blogged about this case last year, and now I've filed a cert petition in the case.
Episode 255 of the Cyberlaw Podcast: Russia and China revamp their military technologies
All are welcome to this week's conference at the Emory Conference Center in Atlanta, Ga., with a selection of nationwide experts on the First Amendment, free speech, academic freedom, and university policies, from both the academic side and the student-affairs professional side.
In 1972, a 4-1-4 Supreme Court decision said "yes" in federal cases, no in state cases; the Supreme Court will now reconsider it.
for excellence in scholarship, teaching, and public impact.
A police schism, a profanity-laced raid, and Mustangs over Berlin.
The Court has released same-day audio of oral arguments before. Why can't it be a regular practice?
The economic benefits of antitrust likely are not worth the costs.
The still-salient case for a biologically-based women's category in elite sport.
Yes, it is all about testosterone.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks