A Qualified Immunity Case That the Federal Courts Got Right
Fatal police shootings and the Fourth Amendment
Fatal police shootings and the Fourth Amendment
Plus: A second person appears to be cured of HIV, cops can destroy your home for no reason and refuse to pay, and more...
The Institute for Justice calls on the Supreme Court to put a stop to it.
Dwain Barton says Officer Dean Vann illegally entered his home and used excessive force while arresting him without probable cause.
In several cases, victims received higher bonds than criminal defendants and were forced to serve jail time.
The Institute for Justice asks the Supreme Court to clarify a doctrine that shields cops from responsibility for outrageous conduct.
Clark Neily's excellent proposal for addressing small, but troubling politice violations of constitutional rights.
In fact, the legal doctrine lets cops to get away with outrageous conduct.
The 7th Circuit said the guard is protected by qualified immunity.
Qualified immunity protects cops from liability for actions that would land ordinary people in jail.
A court ruled that officers did not have enough information to know whether or not stealing violates the Constitution.
Officer Stephanie Branch arrested Avi Adelman for criminal trespass even though he was not doing anything illegal.
Absent qualified immunity, government indemnification and budgeting would continue to dampen the effect of lawsuits on government decisionmaking—but eliminating the defense could exert other pressures on government to improve.
Eliminating qualified immunity would decrease the average cost, complexity, and time spent adjudicating civil rights cases.
Absent qualified immunity, the rate at which plaintiffs win would remain about the same.
What impact would abolishing qualified immunity have on civil rights litigation, police misconduct, and government accountability?
An outcome that's all too rare. Former police officer Matthew Johns attacked a suspect in September 2016, leaving the teen unconscious and with a severe concussion.
The ruling once again shows the legal disgrace that is qualified immunity.
"No reasonable officer would engage in such recklessness," complains dissenting judge.
The ACLU wants the Supreme Court to revisit the notorious qualified immunity doctrine.
A debate today with Professor Chris Walker
Cases in which a majority of the Court fell down on the job.
A libertarian-leaning federal judge and a liberal Supreme Court justice both make the case against qualified immunity.
The state pays (and generously) to avoid the pending cert. petition in Allah v. Milling
In a concurring opinion, Fifth Circuit Judge Don Willett expresses concern about the " kudzu-like creep of the modern immunity regime."
Lots of government officials enjoy legal immunity with a wink and a nod. But in Arizona, immunity is actually official.
Some unusual amicus briefs filed in support of cert. in Allah v. Milling
What today's decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair might tell us about the future of qualified immunity
Here's a theory, at least.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks