For Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, Political Stunts Are More Important Than Substance
Who cares if it’s legal if it generates politically advantageous outrage and attention?
Who cares if it’s legal if it generates politically advantageous outrage and attention?
Reddit users are protesting Texas' H.B. 20, which forces social media platforms to host speech they find objectionable.
Plus: A bevy of bad economic indicators, Italy elects right-wing populist Giorgia Meloni, and more...
Several countries are rejecting Russians fleeing forced military service. But offering them refuge would help protect dissidents and deprive Putin of critical manpower.
Plus: The editors engage in a full-throated denunciation of the CIA in response to a listener question.
A new ordinance passed by the city's Board of Supervisors allows police to request live access to private security cameras even for misdemeanor violations.
Plus: The ridiculous panic over "rainbow fentanyl" continues, Arizona can enforce near-total abortion ban, and more...
Haarlem lawmakers claim the ban will help fight climate change.
A crackdown on insults, hate speech, and misinformation punishes dissenters who express themselves in ways that offend government officials.
Of the over 84,000 public comments available on the proposed Title IX regulations, a third included references to both “sex” and “sports.”
The need for a comprehensive strategy addressing election misinformation.
The relative narrowness of the law, the court concludes, distinguishes the law from the one struck down in Packingham v. North Carolina.
Plus: Student drag shows are protected speech, a bank CEO rebuffs Rep. Rashida Tlaib, and more...
First Amendment implications for state laws targeting election speech.
Michigan is now a more dangerous place for anyone who flies with large amounts of cash.
Even though it might cause pearl-clutching, there is nothing obscene about drag shows.
Unsurprisingly, numerous Russians don't want to be forced to fight in Vladimir Putin's pointless war.
A First Amendment framework for analyzing restrictions on election-related speech.
We’re likely to be poorer, distrustful, and less free for years to come.
Democrats and Republicans both demand solutions that are inconsistent with the First Amendment.
An indictment for a crime, the court stresses, is very different from a conviction of the crime.
An overview of state efforts to combat election misinformation.
It’s a terrible ruling that misunderstands years of First Amendment precedents. And it’s increasingly likely that the Supreme Court will have to intervene.
Although the federal government has largely stayed out of regulating the content of election-related speech, the states have been surprisingly active in passing laws that prohibit false statements associated with elections.
Jimmy Wales talks about why his online encyclopedia works, how to improve social media, and why Section 230 isn't the real problem with the internet.
They mandate occupation of private property without the consent of the owner.
Anti-royalists are facing fines and jail sentences for disrupting ceremonial events
Brittany Martin, who is pregnant, was sentenced to four years in prison after telling police they'd "better be ready to die for the blue. I'm ready to die for the black."
Yes, according to a growing body of research, says criminologist Adam Lankford.
The case is now on appeal after a lower court said the ban on websites promoting prostitution didn't concern protected speech.
The problem is the Court's ultra-broad interpretation of Congress' power to regulate interstate commerce. But the justices might cut that back.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10