The Crusade Against 'Malinformation' Explicitly Targets Inconvenient Truths
The legal challenge to censorship by proxy highlights covert government manipulation of online speech.
The legal challenge to censorship by proxy highlights covert government manipulation of online speech.
A new Netflix documentary shows how the seeds of political polarization that roil our culture today were planted at Waco.
upholds the ban on landlords' taking adverse action based on that information.
An important and compelling new book on qualified immunity and other obstacles to holding law enforcement officers accountable for rights violations.
Plus: A listener asks the editors if the nation is indeed unraveling or if she is just one of "The Olds" now.
"What I saw today was heartbreaking," said the victim's mother. "It was disturbing, it was traumatic. My son was tortured."
A nominee's work defending a state parental-notification law in 2005 may be a stumbling block to his confirmation.
The Court's newest justice questions whether her colleagues are too quick to vacate lower court decisions.
The 11th Circuit panel refused to lift an injunction against the law.
Eye-opening insights into the messy motivations behind restrictive COVID-19 responses.
U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Neomi Rao suggests the full court needs to consider this question en banc.
Nita A. Farahany's The Battle for Your Brain shows how neurotech can help, or hurt, human liberty.
The latest Twitter Files shows a partnership between Stanford University researchers and government-funded organizations encouraged social media companies to police true information.
[UPDATE: This article originally said this what ChatGPT-4 doing this, which was my error. But, as I note below in an UPDATE, ChatGPT-4 also erroneously reports supposed criminal convictions and sentences, complete with made-up quotes.]
The Oregon DMV knew about the problem, but it "wasn't at a high enough level to understand the urgency" of the need to fix it.
The charge is the crime of illegal kidnapping and deportation of Ukrainian children.
"Professors are not mouthpieces for the government," says FIRE's Joe Cohn. "For decades, the Supreme Court of the United States has defended professors' academic freedom from governmental intrusion."
Americans shouldn't have to fight to the death to defend their foes' right to speak, but they should at least stop trying to censor, shame, shun and destroy each other.
Opponents of the reforms favored by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition should acknowledge the threat posed by unconstrained majority rule.
"Then my baby started crying so I reached for my son, and as I'm reaching, a man held me and told me, 'Don't touch him. He's getting taken away from you,'" said the children's mother.
The Constitution was intended to preserve state sovereignty, not create an all-powerful central government.
Understanding what’s at stake in United States v. Hansen
It may be too late for Stanford Law School, but it's not too late for other institutions of higher learning.
All officers and employees of the unit would “have immunity from criminal and civil liability” for performing the activities authorized by H.B. 20.
The bill now bans a battery of poorly-defined "Critical Theory" concepts, and prevents schools from funding programs that promote "diversity, equity, and inclusion."
In countries that privatized, there are fewer delays and costs are lower. But labor unions and the private plane lobby stand in the way.
The bill is overbroad and could have unintended consequences.
The former head of the NYPD and the LAPD talks about how bad leadership creates police brutality and why he's still against pot legalization.
Plus: ACLU sues over low-flying helicopter during protests, Canada's Online News Act, and more...
Supervisors and judges tolerated outrageous constitutional violations, including illegal searches and brutal assaults.
The president wants to redefine federally licensed gun dealers in service of an ineffective anti-crime strategy.
It argues for increasing the number of cases in the Supreme Court's "Hall of Shame" and proposes three worthy additions.
"I know either way he will use it against me.... And after the fact, I know he will try to act like he has some right to the decision," said the woman in text messages to her friends named as defendants in the suit.
The Ninth Circuit has just decided not to rehear this case, so the panel opinion remains the law.
Plus: The editors recommend the best books for sparking interest in free market principles.
In just two weeks, he has learned to hunt and survive. There's a lesson there.
Even as the president bemoans the injustice of pot prohibition, his administration insists that cannabis consumers have no right to arms.
Under the Kelo v. New London Supreme Court decision, a state can take private land to give to a private developer for almost any reason it wants.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10