From NBC, what strikes me as a misleading characterization of Professor Catherine Fisk's confronting a student who pulled out a microphone to orate at a dinner organized at the professor's (and Dean Erwin Chemerinsky's) house.
Such a removal by the city from city property wouldn't violate the First Amendment, but that doesn't preclude claims that the removal violated other legal rules.
Agency pushes the envelope to require gun dealer licenses beyond the statute.
Banning companies for doing business with China is a bad path to start down.
The new rules allow students to be found guilty of assaulting a classmate without ever seeing the full evidence against them.
The 9th Circuit determined that forcibly mashing a suspect's thumb into his phone to unlock it was akin to fingerprinting him at the police station.
At least one inmate claims that the shower stalls, which were just 3 feet by 3 feet, were covered in human feces.
"This bill would basically allow the government to institute a spy draft," warns head of the Freedom of the Press Foundation.
New language could make almost anybody with access to a WiFi router help the government snoop.
Ethan Blevins of the Pacific Legal Foundation explains why. I myself have made similar arguments.
The university has a history of suppressing speech from both sides of the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Economist Bryan Caplan, former National Association of Home Builders Director Jerry Howard, and I will speak at event sponsored by the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University.
Plus: Europoor discourse, NPR's woke CEO, a forgotten tech panic, and more...
The long-time public radio editor's resignation proves he was right all along.
The Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act would prevent law enforcement and intelligence agencies from purchasing data that they would otherwise need a warrant to obtain.
"Profound irreparable harm flows from the Act's chilling of adults' access to protected sexual expression," the filing reads.
A couple of circuit court decisions noted that the intervenors had to have a concrete plan to write about the records; the court here makes clear that such a plan indeed suffices for standing.
Kansas had among the most lax civil asset forfeiture laws in the country, but a bill sent to the governor's desk would strengthen protections for property owners.
An interview with Consumer Choice Center Deputy Director Yaël Ossowski.
Under a legal theory endorsed by the 5th Circuit, Martin Luther King Jr. could have been liable for other people’s violence.
The Supreme Court's interpretation of the statute also could affect two charges against Donald Trump.
It's a good thing opponents of the move can appeal to the liberal values of free speech, free association, and equal treatment under law.
The Court allows takings suit against Texas to proceed under state law, but doesn't resolve question of whether the Takings Clause is "self-executing."
In 2021, the Associated Press uncovered rampant sexual abuse at FCI Dublin. After three years of failing to fix the problem, the Bureau of Prisons is shutting it down.
How a use tax on mifepristone might scramble abortion debates.
"Dr. Morrison brought this lawsuit. He chose to challenge the accuracy of these statements in a public courtroom. If disclosing the allegedly-defamatory statements invades his privacy or causes him injury, it is solely the result of his own actions and decisions."
The push to regulate social media content infringes on rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment.
based on state sealing law. The lawsuit is against a current Vermont legislator, and alleges the defendant had aided and abetted the sexual assault of the then-16-to-17-year-old plaintiff in 1968-70.
Plus: A listener asks the editors for examples of tasks the government does well (yikes).
"I told everybody, 'Do what you want,'" Trump said on Friday night, as he let the deep state win again.
Reproductive freedom initiatives are advancing toward November ballots, putting the matter of abortion access in voters' hands.
One viewer said it should be illegal to take the Lord's name in vain on TV—and that was one of the more coherent complaints.
U.S. need for Australia’s cooperation in the Pacific may win the journalist’s release.
"She prioritizes highlighting the intersectionality that comes with the environmental justice movement to achieve collective liberation for all oppressed communities. In her spare time, she enjoys holding elected officials accountable, watching endless amounts of movies, television series and sports, and enjoying time outdoors with her family and friends."
The decision is unanimous, though some related issues have been left for later resolution.
The measure would have required federal agents to get a warrant before searching American communications collected as part of foreign intelligence.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks