The First Amendment Applies to the FDA Too
Can the government prevent drug firms from telling patients true facts about the medicine they prescribe?
Can the government prevent drug firms from telling patients true facts about the medicine they prescribe?
This could result in a ruling overturning a terrible 1985 decision that makes it very difficult to bring takings cases in federal court.
Age restrictions, body armor bans, and constitutional carry.
Device makers would be required to block porn, prostitution hubs, and all content that fails "current standards of decency."
This arbitrary category of firearms is not distinguished by rate of fire or muzzle velocity.
Best known as the "father of Harlem," he was guided by the theory that free markets penalize bigotry.
Progressives push their luck with their totalitarian insistence that everybody is with them or against them on guns and so much else.
Cody Wilson on his war against power, the irreversible course of the 3D-printed gun, and America's Weimar moment
How to make an assault weapon ban look effective: include handgun murders
A look into a more restrictionist future for the Second Amendment.
No, Call of Duty is not making kids shoot up schools.
How can a company be expected to arbitrate "fake news" when it can't even tell ancient artifacts from porn?
Mandatory fees are an assault on free association.
Indefinite detention carried the day in Jennings v. Rodriguez, but the ruling affirms an important principle that may eventually kill the practice.
Australia's lauded 1996 gun buyback also likely had no real effect on its gun death rates.
Trump's embrace of gun control is consistent with his views before he ran for president.
Senators want to use secret, largely unaccountable government watchlists as a justification for denying some citizens' due process.
The charges -- for "distribution of violent images" -- could lead to up to three years in prison and a $90,000 fine.
"We wanted to capitalize on the real groundswell of support behind free speech from all walks of life."
Depends on what state, city, and county they're in.
This from a guy who bemoaned the lack of due process just weeks ago.
Since the accessories are legal, Attorney General Jeff Sessions is helping the president rewrite the law.
El Paso Democrat, trying to change Texas from red to blue, talks about guns, weed, and how we've already got "record safety and security on our border"
The bill makes "promoting prostitution" a federal crime, holds websites legally liable for user-posted content, and lets states retroactively prosecute offenders.
The policy, which the company wants Congress to impose on the country, is driven by emotion, P.R., and symbolism, not logic.
A third court disagrees. The Supreme Court had the chance to take on the case to resolve the conflict, but it declined.
The justices have passed up one opportunity after another to clarify the boundaries of the constitutional right to arms.
But such a content-based tax would violate the First Amendment.
After missing warning signs, law enforcement and others are now quick to say they need more power to stop the next tragedy.
It's more about sending a message to Congress
"It seems to me your argument doesn't have much weight."
John Stossel picks the best and worst political performances of the year.
Forget the debates over laws that can't make a difference; the heat and noise is really all about political tribes attempting to inconvenience each other.
On today's podcast: Mona Charen gets booed, the gun control debate reignites, public sector unions suck, and Olympic curling is surprisingly awesome.
It is doubtful that the proposed rule would have made a difference in mass shootings.
Rick Scott isn't blazing new ground here.
"I gave him a gun. I gave him a badge. I gave him the training. If he didn't have the heart to go in, that's not my responsibility."
Argues that secret wiretap authorizations were not abused.
In the aftermath of the Parkland shooting.
A self-proclaimed "constitutional bounty hunter" is unlikely to be freed, but his case sets a significant precedent for criminal appeals.
No adults seem embarrassed by this reaction. They should be.
The National Constitution Center invited Alicia Hickok and me to debate Janus; Ms. Hickok wrote an amicus brief supporting Janus, and I signed an amicus brief supporting the AFSCME.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks