Statements about American Jews as a Group Can't Be Libelous
So holds a federal court, quite correctly; of course, the same is true about any religious group, racial group, or other such large group.
So holds a federal court, quite correctly; of course, the same is true about any religious group, racial group, or other such large group.
"This research will inform and fuel much needed and overdue policy change."
An interesting decision in former AP journalist Charles Ganske's lawsuit against former Member of Parliament Louise Mensch, with allegations of Russian bots and Tweeting frenzies thrown in for good measure.
The rhetoric may not be accurate, but it is definitely useful.
The vice presidential candidate opportunistically painted the site's co-founders as villains when they were actually helping law enforcement to catch sex traffickers.
Unconstitutional, says a Massachusetts appellate court (correctly).
When they do specify "common sense" gun reforms, the proposals would do little to stop gun violence.
"CBP asks the Court to close the stable door to keep an invisible horse from bolting. But that stable door sat open for five months before CBP asked the Court to secure it. Neither the Court nor CBP know whether the horse is gone, but the possibility that it's still be there can't outweigh public's interest in open doors."
would clearly violate the Constitution, and so would giving a ticket to your lover because of the romantic relationship.
The First Amendment protects "'anti-Israeli, anti-Zionist, [and] antisemitic" speech, the court correctly observes.
The Democratic presidential candidate favors the same magazine limit that a federal appeals court just declared unconstitutional.
threatens to kick students out of class for "othering." Fortunately, the university has stepped in and rejected this position.
mentioning the name of an officer against whom publicly available complaints -- the contents of which matches the contents of the allegedly libelous post -- were filed.
The case was filed against the Maricopa County Community College District, over Prof. Nicholas Damask's World Politics class.
We don’t trust state-controlled companies in China. Would it be different if we did more of the controlling?
Bonus: We learn that calling a doctor "a real tool" isn't libelous, either.
All the worst people are still mad he blew the whistle on government snooping.
in a case stemming from the Darren Wilson prosecution.
including on their own non-government-run reelection campaign pages. A federal court has just struck that down.
They can be banned, so long as the ban is content-neutral, and so long as people remain free to generally march through the neighborhood (as opposed to protesting right outside the target's home).
The overturned law would have required confiscating all magazines holding more than 10 rounds in California.
At least something good could come out of this mess of an investigation.
Officials have never liked it when people are free to move about—and beyond their reach.
An excellent piece by Harvard law professor Randall Kennedy, one of the nation's leading scholars of race, law, and society.
Even as Americans rely on tech more than ever, our early-pandemic truce with the industry is officially over.
'Political correctness has grown to become the unhappiest religion in the world.'
They are still protected by the First Amendment.
New apps can work as surveillance techniques for the government. They can also serve as anonymous health tools for people hoping to return to normal life.
Despite an alarming increase in crime, Illinois is illegally delaying gun licenses.
The Eleventh Circuit threw out a lawsuit brought by former NRA President Marion Hammer.
"I’m a vegetarian and I love dogs, like Hitler. But the only thing I have in common with Hitler are the good bits!"
"Judges often do not respond well to unreasonable efforts to keep as much out of the public record as possible. At least not this judge."
Huawei’s Safe City security system is undergoing a massive expansion across Belgrade.
The Vermont Supreme Court reversed the order (which had required defendant to stay 300 feet away from the plaintiff).
Jonathan Rauch explains the difference between canceling and criticism
New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change. Out now for subscribers.