Saying Someone "Just Likes to Talk a Lot" Is Not Defamatory
What? Is there something supposedly wrong with liking to talk a lot?
What? Is there something supposedly wrong with liking to talk a lot?
Courts ignore constitutional guarantees while defendants awaiting trial languish in jail.
Yesterday’s Socratic method post followed up today with Jungian analysis.
The plaintiff claims Apple was upset about his stance critical of censorship by the Chinese government, in the context of his reviewing the Guo Media App, established by a Chinese dissent.
Speech targeting whites, males, and Americans would be less likely to be blocked as "hate speech," the Washington Post reports.
So holds the Washington Court of Appeals.
"I am pessimistic about where this goes in the future," says the outgoing chairman, who is stepping down in January.
Words to live by from the President of the University of Chicago, in response to demands to punish a professor who spoke out against various "diversity, equity and inclusion" programs.
We've just filed a friend-of-the-court brief asking the Oregon Supreme Court to protect such equal rights, and overturn Oregon precedent that denies such rights.
Time to add a hat and sunglasses!
Real-time police spying through smart security cams is already here.
at least in the context of a Facebook squabble.
Another unconstitutionally overbroad injunction, struck down by the Florida Court of Appeal.
The outgoing FCC chairman discusses 'light-touch' regulation and the future of free speech on the internet.
Using police to forcefully shut down Mac's Public House is a violation of liberty and a waste of resources.
The Institute for Justice wants the Supreme Court to rule that the Fifth Amendment requires a prompt post-seizure hearing.
Circumstances change and the world may grow more complicated, but authoritarians never vary from their demand for more power over our lives.
A challenge to the federal ban on gun possession by people convicted of felonies gives SCOTUS a chance to rectify its neglect of the Second Amendment.
Earlier in November, surveillance footage captured officers beating a man for not wearing a mask.
The Second Amendment Foundation files a flurry of lawsuits in November, with three aiming at laws restricting public carry.
So a district court suggests in a challenge to a Texas statute that limits drone photography that "surveil[s]" private property—but that exempts similar surveillance by academics and certain others,
The president has the worst record for clemency in modern history.
Is this the Supreme Court’s next big gun rights case?
A company had a trademark canceled in a Trademark Trial & Appeal Board proceeding, based on what the Board described as the company's "delaying tactics, including the willful disregard of Board orders." The TTABlog posted about it, and some commenters criticized the company's lawyer, who sued them for libel.
Don't underestimate the civilization-saving powers of respecting private property and generally minding your own business.
The decision should also support secular private schools having similar rights as well. (Public schools are under control of the state government, and lack First Amendment rights against it.)
With talk of QUEER, 69, AF, OG, "guns, weaponry, shooting, or an instrument normally used to inflict harm," and more.
The legal doctrine provides rogue government agents cushy protections not available to the little guy.
"He is an icon of hate speech and transphobia."
Plus: National Labor Relations Board rules against The Federalist, France is getting less free, and more...
Seems quite inconsistent with basic academic freedom principles.
A court order, in Kelly Hyman v. Alex Daoud, on its face seems to command all Internet services to remove material that mentions the daughter (Kelly Hyman), or her husband (retired federal bankruptcy judge Paul Hyman).
Audits and research into the effectiveness of predictive policing have yielded mixed to negative assessments.
"Underhill was disciplined for publicly responding to former clients’ negative online reviews with internet postings that disclosed sensitive and confidential information obtained during the representation. Underhill then ...."
California is one of nine states that leaves law enforcement with broad discretion to decide whether to grant a license.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks