Should Universities Recommend (or Demand) Epithet Filtering on Students' and Professors' Internet Devices?
A thought experiment that came to my mind; I'd love to hear what others think about it.
A thought experiment that came to my mind; I'd love to hear what others think about it.
Plus a new draft law review article on the subject, by Prof. Randall Kennedy (Harvard Law School), a leading scholar of race and the law, and me.
Across the Atlantic from Amazonia lies ... Ambazonia.
There is enough evidence that the Times knew their allegations were false (or at least were likely false) to go to the jury.
Even the most police-skeptical courts grant the doctrine in egregious circumstances.
Three interesting opinions: a sound majority, a plausible concurrence, and another concurrence focused on "hate speech" that I think is unsound.
The cops seized Kevin McBride's $15,000 car because his girlfriend allegedly used it for a $25 marijuana sale.
A pre-Kenosha poll shows support for Black Lives Matter plummeting among white voters in Wisconsin.
David Cole writes in defense of the National Rifle Association
Neither does Portland. But the fact that the violence is continuous and seems to be escalating is cause for concern.
A 17-year-old Illinois teen has been charged with first-degree intentional homicide.
Millions of new firearm owners who have lost faith in cops and government will be a tough audience for shopworn gun control schemes.
Demand justice for those hurt and killed by police. Stop creating more victims.
Evergreen College, but everywhere
Dean Lidsky is a libel law scholar, and one of the two Reporters of the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Defamation & Privacy.
The Fourth Circuit decides a case involving defendants who violently participated in two white supremacist rallies in California and in the "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville, but the logic applies equally to rioters of all stripes.
"I know what moral panics look like; they look kind of like this."
The new law features harsher penalties, 12-hour detentions, and other invitations to abuse government power
When can libel plaintiffs, suing over allegedly false claims of sexual misconduct, sue pseudonymously? When can defendants defend pseudonymously?
The situation in Portland on Day 87 is not getting better.
Kevin McBride argues that Arizona's civil forfeiture law is unconstitutional.
Increasing tensions between the military-backed ruling class and the student-led democracy movement have prompted massive rallies in the capital.
So holds a federal court, quite correctly; of course, the same is true about any religious group, racial group, or other such large group.
"This research will inform and fuel much needed and overdue policy change."
An interesting decision in former AP journalist Charles Ganske's lawsuit against former Member of Parliament Louise Mensch, with allegations of Russian bots and Tweeting frenzies thrown in for good measure.
The rhetoric may not be accurate, but it is definitely useful.
Stop pandering to Joe Biden and listen to Americans who want to stop shielding abusive officers from liability.
The vice presidential candidate opportunistically painted the site's co-founders as villains when they were actually helping law enforcement to catch sex traffickers.
Unconstitutional, says a Massachusetts appellate court (correctly).
When they do specify "common sense" gun reforms, the proposals would do little to stop gun violence.
"CBP asks the Court to close the stable door to keep an invisible horse from bolting. But that stable door sat open for five months before CBP asked the Court to secure it. Neither the Court nor CBP know whether the horse is gone, but the possibility that it's still be there can't outweigh public's interest in open doors."
would clearly violate the Constitution, and so would giving a ticket to your lover because of the romantic relationship.
"I believe there is sufficient evidence of a clearly established Fourth Amendment violation," writes the dissenting judge.
The First Amendment protects "'anti-Israeli, anti-Zionist, [and] antisemitic" speech, the court correctly observes.
Trying to distract attention from the deadly corruption in his own department, Art Acevedo demands "action at the national level."
The Democratic presidential candidate favors the same magazine limit that a federal appeals court just declared unconstitutional.
threatens to kick students out of class for "othering." Fortunately, the university has stepped in and rejected this position.
mentioning the name of an officer against whom publicly available complaints -- the contents of which matches the contents of the allegedly libelous post -- were filed.
The case was filed against the Maricopa County Community College District, over Prof. Nicholas Damask's World Politics class.