So holds a federal district court, rejecting plaintiff's theories that (among other things) the government compelled the suspension, and that the government and YouTube were engaged in "joint action."
Attempts by British lawmakers to erase online anonymity would lead to radical speech being pushed underground.
Proposed IRS surveillance now limited to non-wage net annual transactions of $10,000 and above. Which is still ridiculously low and intrusive.
Wise words from the target of TrapPartyGate.
The verdict was chiefly based on the actions of protesters and arsonists; the Georgia Court of Appeals rejected it, and the Georgia Supreme Court has just refused to rehear the case.
Richard Martinez lost his dream car because of VIN-plate issues prosecutors admit he was "not aware of."
The lawsuit is brought by the group Indigenous People of Biafra, which has been labeled a terrorist group by the Nigerian government.
A forthcoming article of mine in the New York University Journal of Law & Liberty.
Although the affinities between the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms and the Seventh Amendment right to civil jury trial seem strong, there are crucial differences. The first concerns individual accountability and the ability to understand responsibilities; the second concerns the distinction between substantive rights and procedural rights.
A Supreme Court decision against New York's gun control scheme would be a victory for both criminal justice reform and the Second Amendment.
Founding realities refute New York’s arguments supporting its gun carry ban.
Nancy Pelosi, Elizabeth Warren, and co. insist that the IRS needs to know about $600 bank accounts.
A Cato panel with Judge David Stras (8th Cir.), with some comments from me (on the other side of the Operation Barbarossa front line).
A district court judge found "overwhelming evidence" of Vickers Cunningham's bigotry.
No one is safe from Chappelle's jokes—but also, everyone is safe from Chappelle's jokes.
Former Judge Luttig's arguments are off base.
Administrators attempted to force an apology out of a second-year law student whose Federalist Society affiliations and use of the term "trap house" were "triggering" to his peers.
Such libel cases aren't easy to win, but sometimes they can indeed be won.
denial of access to government property, even in a "nonpublic forum" or "limited public forum"
The Massachusetts Model was not a carry ban and required aggressive behavior before it applied.
With “keyword warrants,” anyone who queries certain terms on search engines will get caught in the surveillance dragnet.
New York takes a long shot at saving its firearm carry ban.
The federal government and police are finding new ways to use drones to invade privacy.
Too often, the government punishes citizens who reveal the state's true behavior to their fellow Americans.
A new short article of mine, calved off my duty-to-take-down-libels article; I'd love to hear feedback, especially suggestions for a clearer title.
The unusually named case is Doe v. Anonymous #1, now pending in Brooklyn state trial court.
New York’s Supreme Court brief on the Second Amendment is flawed.
"after daring to express unrelated views that, although controversial, happen to be held by a majority of the American public."
Kylee McLaughlin is claiming coaches engaged in "pressure and retaliation ... due to her political beliefs and her reactions to claims of racism," because of the coaches' "political or social justice beliefs, including support for critical race theory, opposition to President Trump, and a belief that white persons like plaintiff are privileged and racist."
Miller had asked the court to issue a temporary restraining order; no, said Judge Emily Hagan (Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas).
New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change. Out now for subscribers.
