A school board official told said "students would not participate in a book-club event scheduled for February with Nadia Murad, a Nobel Prize-winner and activist," because "Ms. Murad’s book, 'The Last Girl: My Story of Captivity, and My Fight Against the Islamic State,' would foster Islamophobia."
The IRS' track record suggests that beefed up enforcement will also mean more trampling of Americans' due process rights.
The jury rightly concluded that the prosecution failed to prove its case.
Did you think Kyle Rittenhouse's endorsement of Black Lives Matter was odd? Think of all the unusual stuff you've forgotten.
Some are using Kyle Rittenhouse's acquittal to argue for harsher laws and punishments. Andrew Coffee IV's case is a study in why that's an awful idea.
Florida passed a law to stop big tech “censorship.” But the law itself tramples First Amendment rights.
Restrictions have little chance of moving beyond political theater, or of winning compliance if passed.
No, because courts conclude that those terms are just opinions and name-calling.
The official was the Vice President for Student Affairs and Diversity at the University of North Dakota.
Are universities supposed to have institutional views on the facts about self-defense in a case half a continent way?
We talk about blogging, social media and free speech, the Religion Clauses, and federalism and individual rights.
The newspaper wrongly implies that press freedom is limited to "real" journalists.
The American Civil Liberties Union should not cavalierly take the side of prosecutors against the concept of self-defense.
The trial became an upside-down microcosm for the polarized debates about the U.S. criminal justice system.
British political scientist David Runciman says the answer is "yes." And he makes a stronger case than you might think.
This stop was a Fourth Amendment violation, holds a federal court.
“UNOS’s reasoning boils down to a desire to keep indiscreet communications out of the public eye, which is not enough to satisfy our standard for good cause.”
From leading liberal constitutional law professor Andrew Koppelman (Northwestern), in the Chronicle of Higher Education.
Why trust an agency that conceals information from judges but prosecutes us for lying to it?
"Representatives of a public entity taking the opportunity to squelch plaintiffs' views as apostasy"; the squelching was partly based on claims that certain remarks are "abusive and coded in racist terms, also known as 'dog whistles,'" and that "comments about the District's equity survey" were "'irrelevant' to the meeting agenda item of the District's equity policy."
A surveillance case will determine whether officials can be sued for "national security" rights violations.
A delayed, but hopefully still helpful final rejoinder to Stephen Sachs.
And now an appeals court has ruled the cops who arrested her aren't entitled to qualified immunity from her lawsuit.
Plus: Yale University faces an interesting lawsuit, the ACLU takes a stance on student loan debt, and more...
Defendant had posted three photos to Instagram showing (1) a movie ticket, (2) ammunition, and (3) the inside of a theater, and also one to Snapchat showing (4) a handgun.
Would the outcome in Dobbs put originalism in doubt?
Amar: The Yale Law School administration has been "dilatory, duplicitous, disingenuous, downright deplorable."
Soviet rule promised abundance. Instead it brought misery and starvation.
