New York's Governor Wants to 'Silence' Constitutionally Protected Speech
In response to the Buffalo massacre, Gov. Kathy Hochul invoked a hoary analogy to justify censorship.
In response to the Buffalo massacre, Gov. Kathy Hochul invoked a hoary analogy to justify censorship.
So holds a federal district court today; striking down a Tennessee statute.
The vast majority do not have disqualifying records, and "universal" requirements are easily evaded.
A content-neutral ban on all residential picketing would be constitutional; but the "intent to harass or disturb" limitation may make the law unconstitutional or ineffective.
"The knot in getting that product into the U.S. isn't safety, it's a regulatory issue," says Peter Pitts.
Plus: The editors each point out one key disagreement they have with one another.
The law forces social media firms to host and promote speech they oppose, and would set a dangerous precedent if upheld by the courts.
A federal judge ruled Monday that North Carolina bureaucrats violated the Constitution when they tried to ban a Flying Dog beer over a possible penis on the label.
"It's all induced by the internet," she said.
but that she received from the lawyers for the man accused of killing him.
The problem is not sneaky entrepreneurs who sell accessories; it's legislators who ban guns based on functionally unimportant features.
Plus: Netflix defends artistic expression, perspectives on the baby formula shortage, and more...
A prominent progressive law professor challenges some of the prevailing orthodoxy on Roe, Dobbs, and Supreme Court precedent.
So the Michigan Court of Appeals held Thursday, in a case brought by the former head women's gymnastics coach at Central Michigan University.
Pittsburgh-area developers argue in a new lawsuit that the city's requirement that they include affordable units in their projects is an unconstitutional taking.
A conservative judge expressed skepticism at the panel's conclusion before issuing a strong rebuke of prosecutorial immunity.
When did the K-9 arrive? And what was the probable cause for the search?
"If you’d find it hard to support our content breadth, Netflix may not be the best place for you," the company tells employees.
New York City pressures Wall Street banks to report "self-identified gender, race and/or ethnicity of individual directors."
The account posted items such as (in mid-2020), "ASU: No More Social Distancing. No More Masks. It Is Time to Party!"
Anti-abortion interstate travel bans would have multiple constitutional defects.
The U.S. Polo Association investigation exonerated the plaintiff, but the plaintiff still sued the USPA for libel.
In the infamous Ruby Ridge standoff, federal agents killed his wife and son.
A "disinformation" board sounds like something from a dystopian novel.
Without citing any constitutional authority to dictate state abortion policies, the bill would have overridden regulations that have been upheld or have yet to be tested.
Liberal states don't want to treat abortion as a personal, private choice either. Instead, blue state policy makers want to spend tax dollars subsidizing and promoting it.
The last 50 years have been marked by a remarkably stable social consensus balancing the rights of women and fetuses. Let's not throw that away.
"If treating diapers like a luxury makes you mad, so should taxing them like a luxury," said Paltrow.
Plus: Texas' social media law goes back into effect, inflation worries voters, and more...
"I really think I'm allowed to stay here," I explained, in vain.
The paper blames a "gun-buying spree" during the pandemic for the 2020 jump in murders.
ICE has spent $2.8 billion since 2008 developing surveillance and facial-recognition capabilities, mostly in secrecy and without real oversight.
of South Africa and the European Court of Human Rights."
Plus: A democratic socialist running for office is caught up in a MeToo witch hunt, inflation woes continue, and more...
Americans cannot be neatly divided into two sides, and they do not necessarily understand the implications of Roe v. Wade.
held to be vague and therefore unenforceable.
The abortion precedent has faced withering criticism, including damning appraisals by pro-choice legal scholars, for half a century.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks