The Heritage Foundation Wants To Break the Internet
The conservative think tank identifies some genuine concerns about tech companies, but gets the prescription wrong.
The conservative think tank identifies some genuine concerns about tech companies, but gets the prescription wrong.
The ad was an ad for a college that he had attended.
Nearly 90 gag-order bills would ban schools from teaching the grisly particulars of American history. This activist is fighting against the censorship and for school choice.
The sheriff's deputies are also not entitled to qualified immunity because the First Amendment right to offend police has been repeatedly upheld.
"I think the Chinese government actually takes a lot of pleasure knowing that they can actually strong-arm individuals and companies into capitulation to its own political ideology."
Neither Republicans nor Democrats can be trusted to give an honest account of what happened that day.
"Upon full understanding, I do not view these posters as racist; they are political statements," said university president Mark Wrighton.
In 1000 Years of Joys and Sorrows, the renowned artist details his struggles with censorship.
Regarding the authoritarian country's central bank digital currency, you do not, under any circumstances, “gotta hand it to them.”
“After accepting a ‘friend’ request from the officer, the defendant published a video recording to his social media account that featured an individual seen from the chest down holding what appeared to be a firearm. The undercover officer made his own recording of the posting, which later was used in criminal proceedings against the defendant.” No Fourth Amendment violation, says Massachusetts high court.
What Joe Rogan and Canadian truckers tell us about free speech.
This may be especially helpful in cases involving sealing or pseudonymity, where the parties agree with each other but the public interest ought to be represented.
Plus: Is Web3 a scam? Does the Joe Rogan/Spotify controversy have anything to do with Section 230? And more...
Already abused for political purposes, the power of government shouldn’t be expanded based on lies.
Enforcing that agreement isn’t an unconstitutional prior restraint, holds the Georgia Court of Appeals.
The 22-year-old man was shot by a Minneapolis police officer during the execution of a no-knock warrant on which he was not named.
"The peer-review process—not a courtroom—... provides the best mechanism for resolving scientific uncertainties."
A federal judge declined to issue a temporary restraining order, saying the evidence of legal violations is insufficient at this point.
The Supreme Court will soon decide a case that tests the limits of expression on government property and religious toleration.
Plus: Mask mandates and omicron cases, purging "pornography" drives calls for book bans, and more...
Defense lawyer Amy Phillips is suing over what she calls the department's "watchlist policy."
Despite a binary media narrative, the vast majority of the U.S. is in favor of quality, accountable policing.
“Like it or not, news analysis is often delivered with plenty of English on the ball in service of an ideological agenda and market viability. Whether such practices contribute positively to delivering our species closer to the truth is a question for philosophers. It is not enough to support a defamation claim.”
A Scottish man was just convicted for tweeting an insult about a dead person. The authorities already have too much power to censor.
Well, it's Judge Bradford Thomas of the Florida Court of Appeal, but still an interesting synthesis of recent criticisms, with some extra analysis added.
The scandal du jour reminds us that radical free speech is alive and well.
The bill was introduced in response to a state investigation that found police used fake forensic evidence during interrogations.
Plus: National debt tops $30 trilion, Whoopi Goldberg suspended over Holocaust comments, and more...
What do you think Georgetown faculty should be free to say in the public debate about such matters?
Butts County, Georgia, Sheriff Gary Long cited no evidence to support his pre-Halloween stunt.
and unprotected by the First Amendment. An incorrect decision, it seems to me.
More than 100 law professors agree that "academic freedom protects Shapiro's views."
Plus: The #OldProProject, food truck police, and more...
"If you (or someone you know) are affected by a free speech event on campus, here are some resources..."
A lawsuit claims N.Y. law authorizes this; if it prevails, expect many more such claims in a wide range of libel cases.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10