When Can Lawyers Be Punished for "Undignified or Discourteous" Criticism of Judges?
"Miss Manners has much to commend her within a polite and respectful society, but we are not her enforcement division."
"Miss Manners has much to commend her within a polite and respectful society, but we are not her enforcement division."
"[Indiana's] approach furthers the state's interests the way an atom bomb would further the eradication of a residential ant infestation."
So a federal judge just held.
They have done so banning or severely restricting low-cost "single-room occupancy" (SRO) housing.
The appeals court rejected most of the arguments in favor of that policy, saying "the government must show non-intoxicated marijuana users pose a risk of future danger."
Britain’s crackdown on “zombie-style” knives shows how politicians blame objects instead of criminals—and how bans only hurt the law-abiding.
Plus: Beware of distorted data, inside the mind of Curtis Sliwa, a thong-related clarification, and more...
When children are abused, we want government to step in. But Child Protective Services sometimes goes too far.
It makes the case for abolishing ICE and transferring its funds to state and local police.
The president signed an executive order on Monday establishing specialized units within the National Guard to support federal law enforcement in American cities.
A federal grand jury reportedly refused to indict Sean Dunn for hurling a hoagie at a federal law enforcement officer.
Leaked emails show Epstein’s attempts to dabble in security tech—across borders—in the last years of his life.
A recent federal appeals court decision underlines the importance of that safeguard.
No, says, a District Court judge.
It also rejects Hunter Biden's invasion-of-privacy counterclaim, on statute of limitations grounds.
Plus: Government stake in Intel, inside the DNC, RFK Jr. brings back whole milk, and more...
Plus: An impressive book by a Supreme Court justice.
And this is so even though the order targets flag desecration that could be punished under more neutral rules.
"Disputes between a high school coach and an athlete's parent are common, but most of those disputes do not lead to multiple internal investigations, a police report, and a federal lawsuit. This one did."
The president is the last person who should confuse protected speech with incitement to violence.
Age verification laws are already coming for Americans’ access to free speech.
The appeals court concluded that the government had failed to show that policy is consistent with "this Nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation."
A federal district court judge granted environmentalist groups’ request for a preliminary injunction.
The court also rejected defendants' "necessity" defense.
Despite meeting all the requirements, the Board of Commissioners in Clayton County made an arbitrary decision to deny Khalilah Few a conditional use permit to open her salon.
Convincing the U.K. to stand down on backdoor access to Apple's encryption is a big win. The next battle will be fought over age verification.
Asking SCOTUS to hear a case is not the same thing as convincing SCOTUS to hear a case.
The president ordering federal agents onto the street is not how routine policing should work, even in the nation's capital.
Obviously drag shows are protected by the First Amendment.
U.S.-led economic warfare punishes the world’s most vulnerable while failing to achieve its foreign policy goals.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks