Michigan Supreme Court To Decide If Government Can Warrantlessly Spy on You With Drones
The state court of appeals held previously that unconstitutionally collected evidence could still be used for civil enforcement.
The state court of appeals held previously that unconstitutionally collected evidence could still be used for civil enforcement.
The question: Does the First Amendment allow content-based but viewpoint-neutral restrictions on which trademarks may be registered—here, a restriction on marks that "[c]onsist[] of or comprise[] a name ... identifying a particular living individual except by his written consent"?
Plus: Librarians take on Arkansas book restrictions, another migrant stunt may have originated in Florida, and more...
Online platforms should resist binding us all to the rules of censorship-happy jurisdictions.
Just published as part of the symposium on Media and Society After Technological Disruption, edited by Profs. Justin "Gus" Hurwitz & Kyle Langvardt.
Properly crafted restrictions on displays of pornographic material where minors can see it are constitutional; but the court rules, among other things, that this restriction (1) discriminatorily targets drag shows, (2) lacks an exemption for minors escorted by parents, (3) applies even to venues that try to card attendees but are duped by a fake ID.
The new law dictates a life sentence for anyone caught having gay sex and the death penalty for anyone convicted of "aggravated homosexuality."
"We find that while removing this content does curb some misinformation, it could also have the unintended effect of curtailing political speech."
Maurice Jimmerson has spent 10 years in jail awaiting trial for a 2013 murder charge.
Just published as part of the symposium on Media and Society After Technological Disruption, edited by Profs. Justin "Gus" Hurwitz & Kyle Langvardt.
The symposium was edited by Prof. Justin "Gus Hurwitz" & Prof. Kyle Langvardt, and will be published later this year as a book by Cambridge University Press.
The court had allowed her to litigate pseudonymously at earlier stages in the process, but just held that this doesn’t extend to trial.
The show's final season boldly declared that success requires putting yourself first and accepting the trade-offs.
Plus: Flaws in studies linking teen social media use to depression, debt ceiling deal passes Senate, and more...
The case had involved a doctor who had sued over his license being restricted based on allegations of mental incompetency.
Manufacturing improvements made affordable many types of guns that previously had been available only to the wealthy
The Missouri senator is once again pursuing misguided tech regulation.
Plus: Debt ceiling deal passes House, Congress wants to childproof the internet, lactation consultant licensing law is unconstitutional, and more...
The CEO of Open To Debate wants us to disagree more productively—especially when it comes to presidential debates.
How online “child protection” measures could make child and adult internet users more vulnerable to hackers, identity thieves, and snoops.
Whether the putative target is the "biomedical security state," wokeness, "Big Tech censors," or Chinese Communists, the presidential candidate’s grandstanding poses a clear threat to individual rights.
Laws against displaying Nazi-esque iconography are well-intended, but they pose a threat to free speech and the principles of a free society.
The Administration is hoping that bad facts will make bad law.
Freedom's Dominion argues Southern history was animated by "racialized radical anti-statism." The case is lacking.
The record penalty seems to be based less on the Facebook parent company's lax data practices than the U.S. intelligence community's data-collection programs.
A lawyer for the family speculates that jail officials balked at the medication's high price.
Expect the very foundations of the internet to come under attack from politicians and the mainstream media.
The New York Times asked that their names, and information related to the bail hearing, be released.
"[W]e find no error by the trial court in finding that Father had mentally abused N. The circuit court concluded that N. was 'frightened,' 'scared,' and 'fearful' of his Father's anger and his Father's refusal to accept his sexual orientation."
Police have a long history of using the real or imagined smell of marijuana to justify outrageous invasions.
"[O]ne [tree-cutting] crew member made sexually suggestive gestures towards his fiancée and another waved a running chainsaw towards his dogs with the apparent threat to dismember them ...."
A new report calls for policy makers to take action when none is required.
Despite some headway in protecting privacy, the surveillance state hasn’t gone away.
New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change. Out now for subscribers.