Do We Want Better Enforcement of Misguided Gun Restrictions?
"Universal background checks" could unjustly deny millions of people the right to armed self-defense.
"Universal background checks" could unjustly deny millions of people the right to armed self-defense.
Points out there's no evidence that restrictive gun laws reduce crime
Three wounded, including one of the gunmen
The former president wades in
Not everybody is on-board with the gun grab
Sent home for "terroristic threat"
Gun owners ticked off by control-freak politicians
Which is good, because bans are unenforceable, anyway
Growing rank of rural lawmen uninterested in helping the president violate the Second Amendment
Criminals had started using it to ease their "shopping" expeditions
Idaho Isn't New York, folks
Feds may be on their own
Inconvenient facts go down the memory hole
No semi-automatic weapons and no pointing guns at people
They no doubt have no idea of the irony of meeting there
Says school refused to protect him from bullies
Was the scandal a factor in shaping the president's proposals?
Around 90 percent would support a background checks for all gun purchases
Some of them have elections to worry about in 2014
Allege that Dr. Lynne Fenton was negligent
Same kids who attended Obama's gun control proposals announcement
Who could have foreseen that?
For what, he won't say, but it's apparently too anti-government-y
The feds may have to get their own hands dirty
Most measures will have little or no effect on the problems they are supposed to address
Largely elected, facing pressures appointed police chiefs might not
Not a single one of the items Obama intends to implement would have stopped Adam Lanza.
Doesn't think the president respects the Second Amendment
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.