After Virginia Beach Shooting, a Quick Pivot to Squabbling About 'Silencers' and Trump's Golf Clothes
Plus: Spending bill includes pro-marijuana changes, State Department starts collecting social media accounts of visa applicants, and more...
Plus: Spending bill includes pro-marijuana changes, State Department starts collecting social media accounts of visa applicants, and more...
What happens when cities and counties have their own ideas about a law that authorizes the seizure of guns from people who are mentally ill?
The Supreme Court will consider the petition Thursday.
The senator asked for a private business to squash a citizen's communication, and they did it, though they don't say they did it for him.
So says the Ninth Circuit, treating legal visitors as subject to the same reduced protection as that applied to illegal aliens.
The officers won't be charged, but the DA thinks their actions were "alarming and irresponsible."
The host of Hamilton's Pharmacopeia is already exploring what a post-prohibition world is going to look like.
The host of Hamilton's Pharmacopeia is exploring what a post-prohibition world will look like.
In contrast, police killed nearly 1,000 people last year.
Cory Booker’s plan would unjustly deprive peaceful Americans of the fundamental right to armed self-defense.
The Democratic presidential candidate promises to fight for a design requirement that is not currently feasible.
And that's just one of the measures outlined in his new gun control proposal.
New Defense Distributed chief Paloma Heindorff on making guns, fighting lawsuits, and life after Cody Wilson
So the Wisconsin Supreme Court held yesterday, reversing a Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision.
The process for obtaining "extreme risk protection orders" that take away people's Second Amendment rights is rigged against gun owners from the outset.
Just filed yesterday, and I think it should prevail.
But most gun crimes are carried out with out-of-state firearms.
The California senator claims she could impose "near-universal background checks" and close the "boyfriend loophole" without new legislation.
The East St. Louis Housing Authority stipulates to allowing residents to possess guns.
The organization objects to gun restrictions only if they impinge on other constitutional provisions.
"Sharing our completely legal weekend activities on Snapchat should not result three days of in-school suspensions," Cody Conroy told Reason.
The House version of the reauthorization bill includes new gun restrictions that sweep too broadly.
New York cops and the president arbitrarily turn legal products into contraband.
The Second Amendment covers magazines holding more than 10 rounds, U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez says, because they are commonly used for lawful purposes.
Under pressure, democracies have a nasty habit of acting like panicked crowds.
The ban, which took effect this week, usurps congressional authority by rewriting an inconvenient law.
Two Second Amendment wins late last week.
The government is prohibiting "military-style semi-automatics" and redefining them to include most guns with detachable magazines.
How does shooting teachers with pellet guns make anyone safer?
With big tech helping government officials to control the sharing of information, we need to support alternatives to undermine their censorious efforts.
Press release from Jersey senator asks Twitter to censor specific user @ivanthetroll12.
The Connecticut Supreme Court rejects an absurdly broad definition of "negligent entrustment" but allows a claim based on "unfair trading practices."
Plus: a Rand Paul add-on makes sure measure doesn't inadvertently authorize new wars, Dick's stores are dropping guns, campus art controversy, and good 8A news
Clearly unconstitutional, of course.
Following the lead of their rebellious constituents, local officials say they won't enforce despised rules.
Two bills dealing with background checks would criminalize innocent behavior and unjustly interfere with the exercise of Second Amendment rights.
A lame headline provokes even lamer charges of incitement to violence.
The problem isn't a lack of laws, but poor implementation of those laws.
A clear violation of the First Amendment -- and not even justified under the College's own stated reasons.
The mass shooting became a story about gun control. But it's also a story of incomprehensible government failure.
But the new ordinance violates the First Amendment, because it tends to deter (and deliberately so) association with an advocacy group.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10