Second Amendment Roundup: Bruen Was Right
Joel Alicea’s defense of originalism demonstrates broad applicability of the text-history method.
Joel Alicea’s defense of originalism demonstrates broad applicability of the text-history method.
It’s déjà vu all over again.
It’s a small step in the right direction for self-defense rights.
Is the small-government Democrat beefing up state power?
More litigation is required to find out which kits and unfinished parts are subject to regulation.
Narrow decision leaves ATF regulation in limbo.
Canada long relied on the U.S. for protection. Now it needs to rediscover self-reliance.
Good intentions, bad results.
"even though that necessity wasn't fully apparent in the moment."
The Supreme Court will decide whether this threat to the Second Amendment is legally viable.
Though awkward and antiquated, the Second Amendment’s syntax and grammar unambiguously protect gun rights.
A few months ago, the Sixth Circuit upheld the federal categorical prohibition on gun acquisition and transportation by people under indictment.
Measures restricting gun ownership still disproportionately harm black and brown people, says Maj Toure, founder of "Black Guns Matter."
More laws couldn’t have stopped the crime and won’t stop people from making their own weapons.
Present your paper for review by diverse scholars
Gabriel Metcalf argues that his prosecution under the Gun-Free School Zones Act violated his constitutional right to keep and bear arms.
Maybe we can all agree that government officials shouldn’t target political enemies.
Stop accusing your political opponents of wanting to murder children.
U.S. District Judge Stephen McGlynn says the law bans firearms covered by the Second Amendment and is not supported by historical precedent.
The judges divide over whether a challenge to a law limiting the number of bullets in a magazine is likely to succeed. Is next stop the Supreme Court?
The police targeted “sovereign citizens” for surveillance and disarmament.
But the Arizona Court of Appeals just reversed, concluding that speech about a person generally isn't "harassment," even if unwanted speech directed to the person may be.
Journalists should be interested in interrogating this contradiction, should the 2024 presidential candidate continue giving interviews.
The Supreme Court is considering whether a rule targeting "ghost guns" exceeds the agency's statutory authority.
A great free resource for lawyers, judges, academics, and students doing cross-state constitutional law research.
Innovation and defiance hobble government efforts at control.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks