The University of Idaho General Counsel's Letter on Contraceptives
I think the letter's analysis as to contraceptives is inconsistent with the statutes, and with a binding Supreme Court precedent.
I think the letter's analysis as to contraceptives is inconsistent with the statutes, and with a binding Supreme Court precedent.
Who cares if it’s legal if it generates politically advantageous outrage and attention?
Reddit users are protesting Texas' H.B. 20, which forces social media platforms to host speech they find objectionable.
Haarlem lawmakers claim the ban will help fight climate change.
A crackdown on insults, hate speech, and misinformation punishes dissenters who express themselves in ways that offend government officials.
The need for a comprehensive strategy addressing election misinformation.
The relative narrowness of the law, the court concludes, distinguishes the law from the one struck down in Packingham v. North Carolina.
Plus: Student drag shows are protected speech, a bank CEO rebuffs Rep. Rashida Tlaib, and more...
First Amendment implications for state laws targeting election speech.
Even though it might cause pearl-clutching, there is nothing obscene about drag shows.
A First Amendment framework for analyzing restrictions on election-related speech.
Democrats and Republicans both demand solutions that are inconsistent with the First Amendment.
An overview of state efforts to combat election misinformation.
Although the federal government has largely stayed out of regulating the content of election-related speech, the states have been surprisingly active in passing laws that prohibit false statements associated with elections.
Jimmy Wales talks about why his online encyclopedia works, how to improve social media, and why Section 230 isn't the real problem with the internet.
Anti-royalists are facing fines and jail sentences for disrupting ceremonial events
The case is now on appeal after a lower court said the ban on websites promoting prostitution didn't concern protected speech.
Should an appellate court provisionally seal a brief until the case is heard on the merits? Or should it try to make a redacted version promptly available?
Behind the scenes, federal officials pressure social media platforms to suppress disfavored speech.
Winslow had accused a doctor working on contract with an immigration detention center of "perform[ing] illegal hysterectomies on women at the direction of Trump and [DHS]."
Proposed internet bans open a can of worms about how to punish those involved in creating and consuming controversial content.
A new survey from FIRE shows one-third of college students report it is “sometimes” or “always” acceptable to shout down a controversial campus speaker.
Cloudflare's decision brings up fundamental questions about how internet infrastructure companies should operate.
Plus: The wage premium from having a college degree is falling, study finds black access to firearms reduced lynchings during Jim Crow, and more...
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.