Mocking the Police Is Not a Crime
A First Amendment case prompts The Onion to explain how parody works.
A First Amendment case prompts The Onion to explain how parody works.
The world’s politicians offer a friendly reception to attacks on free speech.
How, if at all, should we try to be nice in an inherently not-nice occupation?
My argument: "Petitioner Jane Doe—a frequent unsuccessful litigant—is asking this Court to impose unconstitutional prior restraint to prevent a law professor from writing about important, publicly available cases about pseudonymity."
The policy, released this week, places unconstitutional prohibitions on faculty speech.
The professor, Joseph Michael Phillips, had spoken about Confederate memorials, race relations, a shooting, and masks.
"Upon careful review, we determined this video is not violative of our Community Guidelines and have reinstated it," said a YouTube spokesperson.
The 6th Circuit ruled that qualified immunity prevented Anthony Novak from vindicating his First Amendment rights.
An appeal a day late (even if not a dollar short). [UPDATE: But there may be a lifesaving treatment!]
Justice Scalia, to the rescue.
I think the letter's analysis as to contraceptives is inconsistent with the statutes, and with a binding Supreme Court precedent.
Who cares if it’s legal if it generates politically advantageous outrage and attention?
Reddit users are protesting Texas' H.B. 20, which forces social media platforms to host speech they find objectionable.
Haarlem lawmakers claim the ban will help fight climate change.
A crackdown on insults, hate speech, and misinformation punishes dissenters who express themselves in ways that offend government officials.
The need for a comprehensive strategy addressing election misinformation.
The relative narrowness of the law, the court concludes, distinguishes the law from the one struck down in Packingham v. North Carolina.
Plus: Student drag shows are protected speech, a bank CEO rebuffs Rep. Rashida Tlaib, and more...
First Amendment implications for state laws targeting election speech.
Even though it might cause pearl-clutching, there is nothing obscene about drag shows.
A First Amendment framework for analyzing restrictions on election-related speech.
Democrats and Republicans both demand solutions that are inconsistent with the First Amendment.
An overview of state efforts to combat election misinformation.
Although the federal government has largely stayed out of regulating the content of election-related speech, the states have been surprisingly active in passing laws that prohibit false statements associated with elections.
Jimmy Wales talks about why his online encyclopedia works, how to improve social media, and why Section 230 isn't the real problem with the internet.
Anti-royalists are facing fines and jail sentences for disrupting ceremonial events
The case is now on appeal after a lower court said the ban on websites promoting prostitution didn't concern protected speech.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.