Is It 'Harassment' To Heckle Your Local Politician? A British Court Thinks So.
Two protesters in Wales were convicted for handing out pamphlets and filming an argument with their member of Parliament.
Two protesters in Wales were convicted for handing out pamphlets and filming an argument with their member of Parliament.
which is to say the court that is the most in favor of public access to court records in such cases.
though the court found the plaintiffs had standing to bring the claim, and gave them one last chance to amend their complaint to plausibly allege enough to allow the case to go forward.
More in Prof. Rebecca Scofield's defamation lawsuit against alleged psychic Ashley Guillard, based on Guillard's accusation that Scofield was involved in the Nov. 2022 murder of four University of Idaho students.
Although the school failed to properly assess whether the threat was valid, school officials determined that his expulsion didn’t violate due process.
The order also covered the man's family and public officials, as well as the lawyers in the case.
Marco Rubio has announced a plan to deny visas to foreigners who censor Americans.
But he declines to conclude that another judge, against whom a complaint was lodged over participation in such a boycott, violated the rules.
Speech codes intended to battle misinformation are instead empowering the government to be the arbiter of truth.
So the Ninth Circuit held today, by a 2-1 vote. I tentatively think the majority got it right as a matter of First Amendment law and statutory interpretation, though I think such statutes ought to be written to include some privacy exceptions as to gender identity and not just sex.
A Massachusetts 7th grader was sent home for wearing the shirt, though the school allows students to challenge the idea it conveyed.
The president's crusade against attorneys whose work offends him, which defies the First Amendment and undermines the right to counsel, has provoked several judicial rebukes.
Swedish authorities voted to criminalize the purchase or procurement of online sex acts, in a move targeting customers of webcam platforms and sites like OnlyFans.
What did that 1995 article trying to predict the Internet future get right? More amusingly, what did it get wrong?
Such removal doesn't violate the First Amendment, the Court holds by a 10-7 vote, because readers don't have a "right to receive information" via government-run libraries.
"This means Harvard can no longer enroll foreign students and existing foreign students must transfer or lose their legal status."
On Monday, the court granted an emergency injunction allowing Rep. Laurel Libby to resume voting and speaking after she was censured for a post criticizing trans women in women's sports.
In the name of "restoring freedom of speech," FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson wants to override the editorial judgments of social media platforms.
In this post, I'll talk about the court's analysis tentatively rejecting the First Amendment defense, an analysis that I think is mistaken (whether or not some tort claims such as these should be allowed despite the First Amendment).
Volokh's view gave breathing room for individuals' speech interests while leaving plenty of space for government to protect people from discrimination
Magician and podcaster Brian Brushwood talks about deception and skepticism while exploring historical hoaxes, the psychology of magic, the libertarian dystopia of Epcot, and the story behind World’s Greatest Con.
Conway, New Hampshire's attempt to force a local bakery to take down the mural "does not withstand any level of constitutional scrutiny," a judge ruled this week.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.