Beyond the First Amendment: Anti-Libel Injunctions in States That Have Repealed Criminal Libel Laws
Even if injunctions against libel don't violate the First Amendment, should state courts still reject them on other grounds?
Even if injunctions against libel don't violate the First Amendment, should state courts still reject them on other grounds?
They're joined by an arrested spa owner and manager in fighting the release of surveillance video, with an array of big media companies on the other side.
Legal scholar Jeff Kosseff wanted to write a "biography" of Section 230, the law that immunizes websites and ISPs from a lot of legal actions. He fears he has written its obituary.
Seems like a pretty clear First Amendment violation, even if the name is viewed as an offensive reference to illegal aliens (which the corporate owners apparently don't intend).
Classifying heavy internet use as medical addiction leads to bad policy and inferior patient care.
Even if injunctions against libel don't violate the First Amendment, should state courts still reject them on state separation of powers principles?
A relatively novel suggestion, aimed at providing libel defendants with the necessary First Amendment protections while still giving libel plaintiffs protection early in the litigation process.
Right after 290 people were killed in a series of Easter Sunday bombings
That's the legal theory behind a case just filed by prosecutors in Ohio.
I'm continuing to serialize my forthcoming Penn Law Review article on Anti-Libel Injunctions.
Protesters said it was "absolutely, unequivocally" not their intention to shut down Legutko. The administration panicked anyway.
Should the availability of anti-libel injunctions turn on the subject matter of the false and defamatory speech that's being enjoined?
The owner of a clothing line asks the Supreme Court to overturn the ban on "scandalous" trademarks because it violates the First Amendment.
The case drew support from rappers like Killer Mike, Chance the Rapper, and Meek Mill.
"Feeling cute, might just gas some inmates today, IDK."
Subreddits on sexual themes will also be banned from running ads.
This is the key proposal from my forthcoming Penn Law Review article on Anti-Libel Injunctions -- a way of taming the anti-libel injunction to include important First Amendment procedural protections, but still allow its use to prevent genuine libels.
Freedom of the press is not limited to "legitimate journalists."
Nancy Pelosi wants to gut Section 230
I'm continuing to serialize my forthcoming Penn Law Review article on Anti-Libel Injunctions.
Journalism is at risk not just from government but from media types who see their jobs as protecting the powerful from embarrassment.
I'm continuing to serialize my forthcoming Penn Law Review article on Anti-Libel Injunctions.
The organization objects to gun restrictions only if they impinge on other constitutional provisions.
Plus: Christians and bureaucrats versus Tarot in Virginia, and Democratic candidates on restoring voting rights to prisoners
I'm continuing to serialize my forthcoming Penn Law Review article on Anti-Libel Injunctions.
They say the social media companies display a bias against conservatives.
Censorship continues to be about empowering those in charge.
Please share it widely!
I thought I'd serialize my forthcoming Penn Law Review article on Anti-Libel Injunctions; here is the section on criminal libel law -- the article argues that anti-libel injunctions are like mini-criminal-libel laws.
My new article, forthcoming in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review late this year -- I'd love to get feedback, while there's still plenty of time to edit it.
Will a thirst to punish Silicon Valley destroy our liberty?
In a now-deleted Facebook post, Loudoun County deputies brag about a drug bust, get dragged, and likely don't learn any lessons.
An allegedly bogus dossier on plaintiff was sent by defendant to a third party in 2003 -- and then hit the news in 2017. Can plaintiff sue for libel?
That's what Christiane Amanpour asked former FBI Director James Comey.
This violates the First Amendment and common law rights of access to court records, I think; Paul Alan Levy (Public Citizen) has just filed a motion to intervene and unseal in the matter (Shelby Resorts Corp. v. Does, in New Jersey Superior Court).
The president of the American Enterprise Institute says we need to reboot politics and that libertarians may hold the key.
Do you have a license to link to that story? Will your sexy Tinder photo get confused with a celebrity's?
It's an order to create policies, not a policy -- so it's hard to tell what it will do until we see what policies various departments create.
Its exclusion of Chick-Fil-A from the airport appears to be based on the viewpoint expressed by Chick-Fil-A and various organizations to which it donates.
Q&A with political strategist Liz Mair.
A very interesting symposium, with (among many others) Floyd Abrams, Prof. Leslie Kendrick (Virginia), Nadine Strossen (former head of the ACLU), and more.
[UPDATE: Sorry, this was double-posted; please add any comments to the post above.]
With big tech helping government officials to control the sharing of information, we need to support alternatives to undermine their censorious efforts.
But courts can't order suspension of an entire account even if they find that some posts were libelous.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.